If the game notes for the USA game have Haack as #2 on the depth chart, then he is the back-up. I hope we won't have to find out during the game. That is all that matters.
You draw a lot of conclusions from Nixon running one play, and a journalist writing an incredibly weak article.
Haack is ready to take over the team
right now. He has had plenty of work in games so far this season, and looked good. Nixon has not, and the season was supposed to include a bit of Nixon running the wildcat for a couple of plays. It makes sense to get him some work, and get the special plays that were drawn for him back into the game plan. That's it. Next season? Who knows. Right now? If Broadway goes down, we'll see Haack. He's miles ahead of where he was this time last year.
I would be willing to bet a C note that if Robinson gets his year back we go with Haack at QB.
Agreed. I've been saying this all along. Nixon is the better backup to Broadway. While Haack is the better qb to base the offense around in the spring. Plus, if something were to happen to Haack next season, I feel like the team would adjust better going from a more pocket passing qb to a scrambler rather than the other way around. That's not a main reason Haack should start next year, but it is a factor to be considered.
There are several reasons that Haack should start next year. Not the least among them is that Nixon cannot be depended on to put the needs of his team above his personal pleasure.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)