A nice preview with odds to win sun belt
2009 Sun Belt Preview/odds
http://www.touthouse.com/sports-bett.-sun-belt.html
A nice preview with odds to win sun belt
2009 Sun Belt Preview/odds
http://www.touthouse.com/sports-bett.-sun-belt.html
I agree with most of the post except:
I do not think Chery inflated Des's numbers because Chery's career is not exactly one for the record books besides, 80% of his production last year came in about 2 1/2 games so I don't think his loss is as big a deal.
I also don't believe in rotating QB's unless they offer something completely different. All of our QB's do the same things well and don't do one thing much better than the next. I say you develop your starter and prepare him but you let the best man win the job. I'm not an advocate of switching through the course of the game in this case because there is a rhythm that needs to be developed with a QB and his offense and you are not allowing that to happen.
Without question, of the skill positions, we are most impacted by how well one or more of our QBs performs. I believe we will run with the tagged QB until he is either injured or doesn't perform. both of which I hope not to see. The only other scenario is a huge lead late in 4Q. Otherwise, Bustle will stick with his starter. and should. MD and Babb were back to back athletic QBs that Bustle could count on their legs. I expect we will not see as much of a running QB this year as in our past many seasons. They will run, but it will not be the first order of business. at least it better not be.
I do not agree that MD was successful running entirely due to Fenroy and Chery. Obviously, it helped that Fenroy was such a great RB, but most defenses keyed on both players to run. Mike deserves his numbers. You could make as much of a case that Fenroy was aided by Mike as the other way around.
Our coaches have their work cut out for them this season. We do not have these established super legs to count on. We have to have a balanced offense, with some nice pitch and catch plays to assist in opening up the run and vice versa. It is going to be interesting.
These preseason predictions speak more to the respect earned to this point in time more than anything else. If you have been good recently, they will rank you as being good this year. If you have treaded water and loss producers, you will be ranked accordingly. They are but summer time filler and chest beating equipment. imo
I want the preseason publications that picked Utah as #2 or Fresno St to win the CWS.
As to QB's, I believe you don't have to an AA or even an All-conference guy to have success, but you do need a guy who can make the basic plays w/o hurting his team.
This is interesting. Fantasy College Football? Anyways, these are some of the top fantasy players in the Sun Belt featured
2009 Sun Belt Fantasy Studs
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/11979040
I was more talkin' bout being able to be successful with a 3 star type QB who played within himself and avoided the costly type mistakes.
Mr. Lee is a talented player, but SU has been hard pressed to be competitive against any FBS teams. imo
Any team can jump up and bite you in the butt if you allow them to, but if this was a softball match SU should be 10-run ruled bout the 3rd inning.![]()
Pretty solid preview
2009 Sun Belt Preview
http://www.collegesports-fans.com/fo.t-preview.html
Thanks for your well-researched and riveting posts. Please come again.
I meant to ask that you try not to read more into the comparison than was warrented.
My bad.
The truth is, for whatever reason, teams have historically shown an ability to rally after studs exit.
Finally, you don't have to be Tennessee to get better from one year to the next.
igeaux.mobi
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)