Hudspeth remains high on Broadway

[cajun4life]

Personally if rather see an offense more like Baylor or A&M. Before you go on saying that we have stud running backs, Baylor has a dynamic passing game but they also led the Big 12 in rushing the past two years.

Both teams exploit spacing and play design to create lanes for passing and running. In order for them to be successful you need a QB who can make accurate downfield throws.

I guess some of yall just like to see us pound it on the ground with a few plays over 20 yards like we have seen so far this year.

[Just1More]

Personally if rather see an offense more like Baylor or A&M. Before you go on saying that we have stud running backs, Baylor has a dynamic passing game but they also led the Big 12 in rushing the past two years.

Both teams exploit spacing and play design to create lanes for passing and running. In order for them to be successful you need a QB who can make accurate downfield throws.

I guess some of yall just like to see us pound it on the ground with a few plays over 20 yards like we have seen so far this year.

I doubt the people you're referring to prefer us to do anything but win. Many have this unrealistic football sense that the running game is separate from the passing game. Reading statistics is the absolute worst educational component of understanding football. Without the detailed information, statistics are meaningless.

We have hit a peak of what physical conditioning and hype will yield. At this point, UL coaching is being tested in the football chess match. And if we are going to succeed, the opponent cannot know that Eli and Zo are our only two formidable offensive threats. If our QB cannot include the other 3 to 5 skill players on the field, including himself, our coaches are a complete failure.

The dumbest thing a coach can do is pound the ball at an inferior opponent... succeed... and believe that what he saw was "they finally executed the way they were coached". If he has a look of exasperation at the end of the next contest... against a better opponent... and says, "we just didn't execute tonight"... he is not a very intelligent coach.

I'm looking at this next game as a test of only our coaches. I know what our players abilities are.

[DieHard1280]

I doubt the people you're referring to prefer us to do anything but win. Many have this unrealistic football sense that the running game is separate from the passing game. Reading statistics is the absolute worst educational component of understanding football. Without the detailed information, statistics are meaningless.

We have hit a peak of what physical conditioning and hype will yield. At this point, UL coaching is being tested in the football chess match. And if we are going to succeed, the opponent cannot know that Eli and Zo are our only two formidable offensive threats. If our QB cannot include the other 3 to 5 skill players on the field, including himself, our coaches are a complete failure.

The dumbest thing a coach can do is pound the ball at an inferior opponent... succeed... and believe that what he saw was "they finally executed the way they were coached". If he has a look of exasperation at the end of the next contest... against a better opponent... and says, "we just didn't execute tonight"... he is not a very intelligent coach.

I'm looking at this next game as a test of only our coaches. I know what our players abilities are.

I agree with what you're saying, but long for the days when a lot more of your focus was on how to look your best in a thong.

[Geaux]

Personally if rather see an offense more like Baylor or A&M. Before you go on saying that we have stud running backs, Baylor has a dynamic passing game but they also led the Big 12 in rushing the past two years.

Both teams exploit spacing and play design to create lanes for passing and running. In order for them to be successful you need a QB who can make accurate downfield throws.

I guess some of yall just like to see us pound it on the ground with a few plays over 20 yards like we have seen so far this year.

Yes. Baylo's O-Line does not block long but you have to be able to throw to the "open" receiver, not only to one receiver. I felt that was our offense with Blaine. He threw to the open receiver. Broadway stares down one guy and defenses load the box against the run. Broadway is the problem.

[CrazyCajun]

Yes. Baylo's O-Line does not block long but you have to be able to throw to the "open" receiver, not only to one receiver. I felt that was our offense with Blaine. He threw to the open receiver. Broadway stares down one guy and defenses load the box against the run. Broadway is the problem.

At Baylor, you have to throw receivers open. You have to throw to where the receiver will be and trust he will be there.

[Cajun Crusader]

Personally if rather see an offense more like Baylor or A&M. Before you go on saying that we have stud running backs, Baylor has a dynamic passing game but they also led the Big 12 in rushing the past two years.

Both teams exploit spacing and play design to create lanes for passing and running. In order for them to be successful you need a QB who can make accurate downfield throws.

I guess some of yall just like to see us pound it on the ground with a few plays over 20 yards like we have seen so far this year.

I'm cool with limited big plays and running it like crazy IF we could play lights out Def. That style goes completely to the wayside If you can't stop anything.