The beginning of your statement is exactly why many of us here who ARE critical of Robe also, in no way shape or form, want him gone. I completely believe he is the right person at this time for the program. In our time of budget woes, I feel it would be stupid to make any move only to have to pay more for somebody who doesn't have the fan loyalty Robe does. However, I believe that Robe's local ties make him Mr. Untouchable in many here's eyes. I have no idea what Robe's "business" successes have been here and how he's better for business than the other coaches but that is completely false. My whole point throughout this has simply been that he should be judged on the same field as others. When you've built a program to a certain level, you don't give "passes" when they've been unable to get their teams' to perform to an acceptable level. It doesn't make sense at this level. For example, Michigan St. is likely going to be the #1 team in the country beginning next year's basketball year or at least in the top 5. What if they were to go .500 for the year and have a losing record in conference? Do you think their fanbase and university would just give coach Izzo a pass because of past successes? They would hold him accountable and he'd take some heat. That doesn't mean that he'd be fired but he'd certainly be under scrutiny. LSU won the national title a few years ago in football. After last year's tough year, they wanted heads to roll when they went 8-5 in a very tough conference. I don't think the fans or the university gave the coaching staff a "pass" due to recent successes as they were supposed to do much better. Coaches were fired and you can bet that expectations are high once again.
If you don't agree, there's not much else that can be said. I just feel that he should be judged and criticized if need be on the same level as other coaches. When expectations are higher, failure is less acceptable.