Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 109

Thread: Is it time for a change?

  1. #81

    Default Re: Is it time for a change?

    We have been in the regionals 2 of the last 7 years.

    We haven't been through this kind of a stretch in about 20 years.

    Also, players who will be seniors in high school this fall, were in the 3rd grade when we went to Omaha.

    In a couple of years, all of the players we will be recruiting will have no memory of our Omaha trip.

    What I'm trying to say is that there is no question that we've hit a rough patch. Trying to sugarcoat it will do no good.


  2. #82

    Default Re: Is it time for a change?

    Another losing season? This was the first losing season in around 12 years! Also, where was Fresno State ranked last year to start the season? Thats right, around the same area as the Cajuns. They got hot late and won the title.

    Baseball cant be evaluated like the rest of the sports for many reasons, one being those hefty 11.7 scholarships for a 35 man roster. Look at the records of teams in college baseball. You have the top notch who win 40+, then you have the next level who win 30+, then you have the others who win less then 30. Robe has consistently been in that second level and had a couple teams in the top notch during his career. Were these last 2 years a dissapointment? Yes. But also remember that they are teaching a new hitting philosophy with the addition of Trahan, which came around in spurts this year. The guys werent trying to hit the sign in left anymore, they were trying to drive the ball from center to the opposite gap. Everything will be fine, plenty of returning talent and a wealth of experience gained this year by the freshmen.

    Rant complete! Have a nice day. I need a drink lol


    igeaux.mobi


  3. #83

    Default Re: Is it time for a change?

    Quote Originally Posted by cjr3888 View Post
    _ Another losing season? This was the first losing season in around 12 years! Also, where was Fresno State ranked last year to start the season? Thats right, around the same area as the Cajuns. They got hot late and won the title.

    Baseball cant be evaluated like the rest of the sports for many reasons, one being those hefty 11.7 scholarships for a 35 man roster. Look at the records of teams in college baseball. You have the top notch who win 40+, then you have the next level who win 30+, then you have the others who win less then 30. Robe has consistently been in that second level and had a couple teams in the top notch during his career. Were these last 2 years a dissapointment? Yes. But also remember that they are teaching a new hitting philosophy with the addition of Trahan, which came around in spurts this year. The guys werent trying to hit the sign in left anymore, they were trying to drive the ball from center to the opposite gap. Everything will be fine, plenty of returning talent and a wealth of experience gained this year by the freshmen.

    Rant complete! Have a nice day. I need a drink lol


    igeaux.mobi _

    Nothing you have said is untrue. The point is made again. We were simply stating that he is given a "pass" or more leniency towards these failures because of past success but the bar has been raised. The program is or should be in a state of consistent production. It's one thing to falter on the national scene but we haven't competed in our own conference and when you throw the expectations of 2008 in there and consider the "talent" we had, that team fell flat on its face. What we're saying is if this was basketball or football, the uproar would be greater.

    While the sports are different, why should the scholarship issue be an issue? It's the same everywhere. That could be seen as a copout. The lack of a proper athletic budget also affects football much more than it does baseball. There is a different path that many choose to evaluate performances of baseball vs. other sports here pure and simple.

  4. #84

    Default Re: Is it time for a change?

    Quote Originally Posted by bruh View Post
    _ I agree with you, and it should be that way, however, we cannot be compared to colleges like Michigan State and LSU in the reason that there coaches have one job: Run the operations of the program: There programs are financially self sufficient. The business that coach brings to the program is thay UL baseball is essentially a club sport with a 0 dollar budget from the university. Robe has built the program into the best program in the league and one of the finest programs in the country. (that's the business side that I was talking about). Bustle hasnt done that and neither has Lee. Thats the difference. Right now, baseball is the only revenue generating sport in the school. (maybe softball, but I'm not sure). With him gone, the "program" cannot sustain from a money making stand point.

    Of course excellence should be the standard. The program should be criticized and fans have every right to be mad and demanding change. All I'm saying is that the primary reason the university sponsors an athletic department is to make money. Robe is the coach who can raise the most capital for his program, therefore he is the coach.

    PS. Even at big schools, coaches dont get fired until the boosters declare that they will take there money elsewhere. It's not about winning its about the dolla dolla bills yall.

    If it don't make dollars then it don't make sense _


    Well, in relative terms hasn't bustle built the football program to a better level than it was 10 years ago? While it certainly is not a top program even in the SBC, it is in a far greater position than it was back then and progress is certainly made. This sport is much more directly affected by the athletic budget or lack thereof in our case. I'd argue that Bustle has managed his "business" to a greater level. Lee has seen attendance drop and has certainly done nothing in that dept but Bustle has us averaging the most for home games over ANY other SBC team and we will likely sell out 2 games this year and possibly more. Again, I'd say he's been just as good for business or better

  5. #85

    Default Re: Is it time for a change?

    Quote Originally Posted by cjr3888 View Post
    _ Another losing season? This was the first losing season in around 12 years! Also, where was Fresno State ranked last year to start the season? Thats right, around the same area as the Cajuns. They got hot late and won the title.

    Baseball cant be evaluated like the rest of the sports for many reasons, one being those hefty 11.7 scholarships for a 35 man roster. Look at the records of teams in college baseball. You have the top notch who win 40+, then you have the next level who win 30+, then you have the others who win less then 30. Robe has consistently been in that second level and had a couple teams in the top notch during his career. Were these last 2 years a dissapointment? Yes. But also remember that they are teaching a new hitting philosophy with the addition of Trahan, which came around in spurts this year. The guys werent trying to hit the sign in left anymore, they were trying to drive the ball from center to the opposite gap. Everything will be fine, plenty of returning talent and a wealth of experience gained this year by the freshmen.

    Rant complete! Have a nice day. I need a drink lol


    igeaux.mobi _
    Hitting philosophy had nothing to do with how bad we sucked this year. You can either hit or you can't. When you get into the box at least when I got into the box I looked for 1 pitch, and when I got that pitch I didn't miss it to many times. The problem with the guys that we have is they are not jumping on pitches early in the count. Some looked overmatched by fastballs, there is no excuse for that!

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun2bag View Post
    Hitting philosophy had nothing to do with how bad we sucked this year. You can either hit or you can't. When you get into the box at least when I got into the box I looked for 1 pitch, and when I got that pitch I didn't miss it to many times. The problem with the guys that we have is they are not jumping on pitches early in the count. Some looked overmatched by fastballs, there is no excuse for that!
    What is the top arm speed and machine speed a batter sees in batting practice?
    igeaux.mobi

  7. #87

    Default Re: Is it time for a change?

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    _ What is the top arm speed and machine speed a batter sees in batting practice?
    igeaux.mobi _
    Maybe next year we can get someone throwing 100 during BP and they will hit a fastball. If you can't catch up to a 90 mph fastball you can't play at this level.

  8. #88

    UL Baseball Re: Is it time for a change?

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    Nothing you have said is untrue. The point is made again. We were simply stating that he is given a "pass" or more leniency towards these failures because of past success but the bar has been raised. The program is or should be in a state of consistent production. It's one thing to falter on the national scene but we haven't competed in our own conference and when you throw the expectations of 2008 in there and consider the "talent" we had, that team fell flat on its face. What we're saying is if this was basketball or football, the uproar would be greater.

    While the sports are different, why should the scholarship issue be an issue? It's the same everywhere. That could be seen as a copout. The lack of a proper athletic budget also affects football much more than it does baseball. There is a different path that many choose to evaluate performances of baseball vs. other sports here pure and simple.
    I remember Robe speaking about the preseason ranking in 2008 saying it was nice but doesn't get you any wins. In my opinion, the ranking was totally based on the returning pitching expectations. Based on those expectations, our team ERA went from 3.78 in 2007 to 5.0 in 2008. The only pitcher to match his previous year performance was Hunter Moody. All of the other pitchers had their ERA's go up by at least 2 runs per game. We also lost Matt Pilgreen and Andrew Laughter, who both pitched great out of the bullpen.

    Most people forget the offense we lost on the regional team of 2077. Our offense in 2007 was much better than 2008. We had a team batting average of .310 (versus .248 in 2008) and we lost the top two hitters from the team (Lucroy & Tatford). In addition, Gisclair, Logan & Hawkins had their best hitting years. The lineup did a great job of protecting hitters so opposing pitchers didn't get a rest throughout the lineup. We batted Devon Bourque near the end of the order, and he only hit .257 but had an on base percentage of .402 and drove pitchers crazy. Without the consistancy and leadership we lost in the lineup, the returners didn't have the best followup year. In 2008, the three returning players (Hawkins, Gisclair, Logan) went down an average of .050, with only one being over .300. Losing Kolin Hatfield to injury for the season also removed a returning player that could have helped.

    I'm not making excuses, because the players on your roster have to step up when you go from year to year, but we did lose some special players that 2007 year. I think an attitude by a few players can drive a team attitude, and I think we lost our attitude after the 2007 season, and still haven't found a new one yet.

  9. #89

    Default Re: Is it time for a change?

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunAmos View Post
    _ I remember Robe speaking about the preseason ranking in 2008 saying it was nice but doesn't get you any wins. In my opinion, the ranking was totally based on the returning pitching expectations. Based on those expectations, our team ERA went from 3.78 in 2007 to 5.0 in 2008. The only pitcher to match his previous year performance was Hunter Moody. All of the other pitchers had their ERA's go up by at least 2 runs per game. We also lost Matt Pilgreen and Andrew Laughter, who both pitched great out of the bullpen.

    Most people forget the offense we lost on the regional team of 2077. Our offense in 2007 was much better than 2008. We had a team batting average of .310 (versus .248 in 2008) and we lost the top two hitters from the team (Lucroy & Tatford). In addition, Gisclair, Logan & Hawkins had their best hitting years. The lineup did a great job of protecting hitters so opposing pitchers didn't get a rest throughout the lineup. We batted Devon Bourque near the end of the order, and he only hit .257 but had an on base percentage of .402 and drove pitchers crazy. Without the consistancy and leadership we lost in the lineup, the returners didn't have the best followup year. In 2008, the three returning players (Hawkins, Gisclair, Logan) went down an average of .050, with only one being over .300. Losing Kolin Hatfield to injury for the season also removed a returning player that could have helped.

    I'm not making excuses, because the players on your roster have to step up when you go from year to year, but we did lose some special players that 2007 year. I think an attitude by a few players can drive a team attitude, and I think we lost our attitude after the 2007 season, and still haven't found a new one yet. _

    And you also mentioned a lot of players who carried over from that 2007 team to 2008 who didn't have as good of years. Some here would say that goes to coaching. I believe that people can have off years but I'm simply trying to parallel the sports the best I can. Also, I'm glad you mentioned the expectations for the 2008 team. I do not doubt that maybe those expectations were possibly a bit exaggerated. However, in defense of my argument, compare the expectations of football for last year and that 2008 baseball team. Football was picked to finish 4th in its own conference by most and that was with Fenroy and Des coming back. They ended up 2nd in conference, had 2 more wins than most predicted and their play for 8 weeks last year excluding the injury pileup was the best I've seen in YEARS. Take all that and search the posts here after the season and snub by the bowls and you have nothing but blame pitched at T-Joe all the way to Bustle. People were angry saying that he's had enough time here to right the ship and get things to a winning level. Baseball fell flat on its face that year and barely made the conference tourney. Not much in way of criticizing Robe was mentioned here and those who did were criticized themselves. You take into consideration that Bustle has increased attendance to where we now lead the league in this category ahead of the frontrunners such as Troy and FAU and he's improved the facilities and program in spite of a miserable athletic budget. While he's no Joe Paterno, he's certainly done more with less in my book but every year fights off much more criticism than some of his colleagues.

    Good post though.

  10. #90

    Default Re: Is it time for a change?

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    And you also mentioned a lot of players who carried over from that 2007 team to 2008 who didn't have as good of years. Some here would say that goes to coaching. I believe that people can have off years but I'm simply trying to parallel the sports the best I can. Also, I'm glad you mentioned the expectations for the 2008 team. I do not doubt that maybe those expectations were possibly a bit exaggerated. However, in defense of my argument, compare the expectations of football for last year and that 2008 baseball team. Football was picked to finish 4th in its own conference by most and that was with Fenroy and Des coming back. They ended up 2nd in conference, had 2 more wins than most predicted and their play for 8 weeks last year excluding the injury pileup was the best I've seen in YEARS. Take all that and search the posts here after the season and snub by the bowls and you have nothing but blame pitched at T-Joe all the way to Bustle. People were angry saying that he's had enough time here to right the ship and get things to a winning level. Baseball fell flat on its face that year and barely made the conference tourney. Not much in way of criticizing Robe was mentioned here and those who did were criticized themselves. You take into consideration that Bustle has increased attendance to where we now lead the league in this category ahead of the frontrunners such as Troy and FAU and he's improved the facilities and program in spite of a miserable athletic budget. While he's no Joe Paterno, he's certainly done more with less in my book but every year fights off much more criticism than some of his colleagues.

    Good post though.
    Last point. I may be misinformed, but Baseball, from my understanding, has no budget except salaries for coaches and some travel. Recruiting budgets and most of the recent facility improvements were donated. Our park is probably now in the bottom two or three in the conference.

    Despite that, we have the best atmosphere in the country (IMO) and are in the top 25 yearly in attendance. I attribute the majority of that situation to the coach.

Page 9 of 11 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. baseball time change
    By raginrayne in forum Baseball
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 14th, 2018, 12:22 am
  2. Time Change Plagues Forecaster
    By NewsCopy in forum News Acadiana
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 17th, 2010, 09:20 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •