I am getting convinced that we are not trying to actually come to a consensus on this subject, but rather there is such extreme boredom in the air that the worst scenario is to reach agreement.
Let's say you get rid of Robe. Who in the heck are they going to bring in? Considering the school gives the baseball team 0 dollars a year, considering the fact that Robe has deep relationships with all of his boosters who would probably keep their money if coach was axed, considering his impact on the community and what he does strictly from a business stand point for the program.
If Robe leaves you are looking at a program that will average about 300 fans a game, a program which would probably lose it's TPX contract, and with a new coach having to raise all the funds, you won't get an upgrade, only a down grade.
Your coach would likely be a local high school coach with ties in the area.
Sweet idea.
Robe has earned a pass because what he does from a business aspect for the university. This after all is a business right. Bustle and Lee havent done that and that is why they are expendable.
The beginning of your statement is exactly why many of us here who ARE critical of Robe also, in no way shape or form, want him gone. I completely believe he is the right person at this time for the program. In our time of budget woes, I feel it would be stupid to make any move only to have to pay more for somebody who doesn't have the fan loyalty Robe does. However, I believe that Robe's local ties make him Mr. Untouchable in many here's eyes. I have no idea what Robe's "business" successes have been here and how he's better for business than the other coaches but that is completely false. My whole point throughout this has simply been that he should be judged on the same field as others. When you've built a program to a certain level, you don't give "passes" when they've been unable to get their teams' to perform to an acceptable level. It doesn't make sense at this level. For example, Michigan St. is likely going to be the #1 team in the country beginning next year's basketball year or at least in the top 5. What if they were to go .500 for the year and have a losing record in conference? Do you think their fanbase and university would just give coach Izzo a pass because of past successes? They would hold him accountable and he'd take some heat. That doesn't mean that he'd be fired but he'd certainly be under scrutiny. LSU won the national title a few years ago in football. After last year's tough year, they wanted heads to roll when they went 8-5 in a very tough conference. I don't think the fans or the university gave the coaching staff a "pass" due to recent successes as they were supposed to do much better. Coaches were fired and you can bet that expectations are high once again.
If you don't agree, there's not much else that can be said. I just feel that he should be judged and criticized if need be on the same level as other coaches. When expectations are higher, failure is less acceptable.
I agree with you, and it should be that way, however, we cannot be compared to colleges like Michigan State and LSU in the reason that there coaches have one job: Run the operations of the program: There programs are financially self sufficient. The business that coach brings to the program is thay UL baseball is essentially a club sport with a 0 dollar budget from the university. Robe has built the program into the best program in the league and one of the finest programs in the country. (that's the business side that I was talking about). Bustle hasnt done that and neither has Lee. Thats the difference. Right now, baseball is the only revenue generating sport in the school. (maybe softball, but I'm not sure). With him gone, the "program" cannot sustain from a money making stand point.
Of course excellence should be the standard. The program should be criticized and fans have every right to be mad and demanding change. All I'm saying is that the primary reason the university sponsors an athletic department is to make money. Robe is the coach who can raise the most capital for his program, therefore he is the coach.
PS. Even at big schools, coaches dont get fired until the boosters declare that they will take there money elsewhere. It's not about winning its about the dolla dolla bills yall.
If it don't make dollars then it don't make sense
You are partially correct my friend! We have not had back to back losing seasons. We finished 30-29 in 2008. We did not have a losing season last year and next year would not be 3 losing seasons in a row. This is only Robe's 2nd losing season in 15 years as the Cajun skipper. I believe 1996 was his other losing year. Don't embellish the facts.
GEAUX UL!
That is what you said.
This was posted by Zeph
"When you are expected to possibly go to the CWS and you end the season .500 and barely making your own conference tourney, there needs to be some questions answered in my book."
He was talking about 08, because we had CWS expctations and finished 7th in the SBC. Finishing the season at 32-32.
Come on dude, I guess you still like TM music I guess?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)