I don't know. Auburn and Clemson are the names of the small towns those universities are located in and both cities have high schools with those same names. Yet, it doesn't effect them. Are they more regional than Acadiana? At least Acadiana is an area of the state that denotes Cajun Country where we are the Ragin Cajuns. It is clearly a unique identity. And, we have history and tradition as Universite' des Acadiens. Plus, UL Lafayette already has the Lafayette name, be it city or high school, and I don't recall anyone using the Lafayette High School reference to us.
What about Appalachian State, that is a region in North Carolina? How many universities have city names? Does that make them regional? Ex. Akron, Boise State, Buffalo, Cincinnati, Houston, Louisville, Memphis, Miami, Troy, & Tulsa. Is Northern Illinois not a region of that state, or East Carolina, or Southern Cal, North Texas, etc.? What about Northwestern of the Big 10? It isn't even located in the Northwest part of the US or of Illinois, but it is in the Northwest area of Chicago.
I agree, this is extremely frustrating. Do I want to change? No. But, I am open to it if it will resolve this name debacle. We differ on how we think Acadiana University will be accepted. We would be known as Acadiana, AU, just like Clemson and Auburn. It would not take long to take root. We would not share our identity with any other university and that is a good thing. I also think the Acadiana region would embrace the university much better than Louisiana-Lafayette.