Because we had plenty of time and chances to change that and we didn't. You realize we were the 2 td favorites at home right? It that play was such an anomaly, why did we have 2 more in the same game. We got our azzes handed to us, we picked up late garbage time scores. If the starters stay in the whole game I only see the score being worse. With or without the 99 yard run. I hope the whole game was an anomaly, maybe tech is a lot better with a competent QB and good DC than we think they are. It was a busted play I. The first half, we lost by 4 touchdowns and it wasn't even that close.
If a building is a solid structure and a well placed explosive at the base of the foundation causes a slow degradation of the building until collapse...you wouldn't say the building was going to collapse eventually. Throwing causality out the window is not a smart move.
The exact same play was run by Tech earlier in the game on the 4th down try we stuffed. Let's say we stuff that run and force them to punt from their endzone. We were gaining yards in bunches already just not cashing in. It was only a matter of time before the flood gates opened. Diaz was not blitzing at the beginning of the game. Our team was not prepared at all for this to be a dog fight, or a blow out on the wrong side of the ball. But you cannot turn a blind eye to how much that 99 yard run affected the game.
If Peyton manning doesn't miss the first snap of the Super Bowl the broncos win, that's what that sounds like.
You know who we needed Saturday night?
Blaine Gautier
A true gunslinger with a canon for an arm.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)