Does anyone know or can anyone name a Division I school who has been penalized by the APR? In other words are there any other schools prohibited from going to the post season?
The other afternoon on Ryckman's show, Parrott was saying something about the program not only having to achieve a good APR score this year (08-09), but that they also had to post another good score in 09-10, or else they would still face penalties. Does anyone know what this is about? If a school's APR is judged on 4 year rolling averages, then why is a 5th year being worked in?
I updated the chart in post 1 hopefully it explains things better.
Bottom line is, if UL was going to be penalized in the post season for all sports it would have happened already.
We are currently living under
2003-04 - Evans
2004-05 - Lee
2005-06 - Lee
2006-07 - Lee
The 2007-08 numbers while already known for almost a year will officially be release by the NCAA in May.
It is important to note that every day that 2007-08 was being compiled in the classroom; it was virtually pushing 2003-04 off the books.
While there is a 2 season delay between when the numbers are created and their effect on the program, as we read 2008-09 is virtually pushing 2004-05 off the books.
Next year 2009-10 will erase the effects of the very bad year of 2005-06.
Not much needs to happen good in 2009-10 if all the players make the grade as many as 11 could transfer without any historical repercussions to the school when that particular years historical period begins. It is not that easy however as 3 perfect APR years would need to follow.
What could happen in 2009 with zero consequences . . . is 3 players could transfer and UL would still score a satisfactory .928 with a historical score of .976 when that year’s historical phase kicks in 2 years later.
Geaux Cajuns
Go to the NCAA APR ratings site.
http://www.ncaa.org/wps/ncaa?ContentID=329
The U. of LaTextsers@Ruston is dealing with a basketball scholarship loss (maybe more) due to an APR penalty.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)