-----Jay i was thinking that one great thing that could happen with the new paper in the area was that the stories could run in the BR and NO editions---have been to NO fairly much but mixed coverages are there with a sometimes an article to NOTHING---was this suppose to be the modus operendi???
I read the online version of the advocate because it is free, I don't read the advertiser online because it is not free and I also do not care for Bucky.
I am reading the Advocate every day. The kid flat out knows how to write and the coverage is great. I hate the fact that The Advocate publishers are still petty and childish. Seems to me that people that still act this way are scared of UL and its potential.
I pay for a monthly subscription to the DA because it is my local paper...and, as life may offer SOME things for free, publishing a paper isn't one of them. I work for a living and my work isn't free. I have, though, been looking for someone to cut my grass and wash my vehicles for free, but...as of yet...have not found anyone.
I understand people need to make money on items and goods, but it is free for now and I will take advantage of that fact. I am sure sooner or later they will start charging and when they do I will stop reading or do the same tricks that I use to read the advertiser when I find something interesting. Most of you do not know my situation but I am currently paying to house notes and have turned off cable TV in both house. It is called priorities and paying for a subscription online or to have it delivered is not a priority in my life right now. I would rather pay for my season tickets and memberships to the rebounder's club & diamond club. As for those two sports I have more information than anyone could write in either paper.
Darn, can't read it from work. Considered a gambling site........
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)