Hey Just1More,
Why don't you tell us how you REALLY feel !!!!!!!!
Thing is I know we all feel the same way about UL and our gov't "leaders"
Hey Just1More,
Why don't you tell us how you REALLY feel !!!!!!!!
Thing is I know we all feel the same way about UL and our gov't "leaders"
Amen brother... great post.... and if I have not been clear my real displeasure IS with the administration. The lack of committment to improve things.. the acceptance of mediocrity for YEARS... I do think the toruble lies with the fans but not for a lack of support...I think we can be blamed for not being more vocal in our displeasure of the way athletics is being run... I think we compare favorably with many of the mid majors attendance wise and that in light of the absymal products that are year in and year out put in front of us... Certainly there are exceptions like softball (missing them today but watching on KLAF... I will be there tonite) and baseball.... but as everyone knows football drives the bus ( to quote Tony) and that product is down right embarrassing... sorry folks but its true..... try being me... hating a&m@br while they are doing what they are doing and supporting my Cajuns.. I will always support them but I wont be quiet about this administration
Good post. I have to admit I have come around to your way of thinking. For good and bad UL has always been an insular community. Loyalty has always been the best way to move up the ranks. This is why it is so hard to change a culture. So far I have seen little difference in style or substance in the "new" administration. If things do not change drastically expect the improvement to be measured and bring about more frustration.
As you alluded to, our frustration is he ony way this program is going to change.
Sometimes, I lose my temper. One of those times is when UL fans are told that they are the problem.
It is remarkable how much support Cajun athletics receives from the public given the absolute, gross mismanagement of the entire athletic department for several decades by inept bureaucrats.
No school in the SBC has the fan support for the majority of sports that we do.
No school in this league, except UL, can produce 30 freakin' thousand for a conference football game.
People like to compare this athletic department to a sleeping giant. That is correct. They are sleeping, a deep, coma-like sleep. The "giant" part of it are the fans.
Did Jay Walker actually say that? With our record and tradition it is nothing short of amazing the support we do get.
I agree with you 100% about the admin. It must start from the top and be something different than "We are committed to 1-A football". They need to make some moves to show us they mean what they say.
I'm not throwing Jay under the bus... he's a UL trooper and in a pinch with his career to state publically what he truly believes... but yes... he has on several occasions stated directly that fans need to put out the money and support and if not, we are the ones to blame for UL athletic issues. That is incorrect. The pipes are there. The valve operator is the UL admin. I think fans have over-supported for what they've gotten in return.
The focus isn't on Jay, our newspapers, our students, our band, our fans, our athletes, or even our coaches (hired and/or fired by the admin). Our focus has to be on our administrators. If they are as comfortable and arrogant as our past administrators... we will keep getting the same... and you can't blame fans for not liking that.
I never really liked Jay as an announcer. He is good at the play by play. I'm sure his a great guy. I could do without his little snide comments.
You are 100% correct about it starting with the UL admin. The RCAF will tell us how serious we are about football. Tulane is a good case in point. When they withdrew from the SEC they pretty much said hey we don't care. A Tulane fan I know has told me the admin has said things to the effect they don't care (Don't hold me to that because I didn't hear it personally). I went to a Tulane vs. Texas game a few years back and the old stogies were complaining about the games being held at the other stadium (The name of the outdoor stadium in N.O. escapes me right now). I had a chance to be in a suite and those guys like the Superdome rather empty. If they are not serious come out and tell us so we can go about our lives.
This is the best thread I've seen all year, awesome posts people!!!
REAL = realistic
Because you would have to be a complete dumbass to think that facilities do not matter in the recruiting process, and that recruiting does not matter in creating an up and coming program. I have not been a UL fan for long enough to understand your pain, but I have seen programs turn things around and understand the reality of what has to happen.
Do miracles occur? Sure they do...
UL is better off trying the tried and true method of "dressing for success" that has worked for several programs, like UConn as an example. A perenial pushover on the football field, invested in facilities, and in 6 years has become a top 25 team. My point was, build top tier facilities, and then expect your program to become top tier.
Stomping your feet about it just wears out your shoes...
PS: Utah beat Alabama with redshirt seniors from the 95th ranked recruiting class in the country in 2003!
But don't you think that the administration HAS committed itself to improvement of the program in recent years. You have improvements such as the indoor practice facility and turf for the field, overall cleaning of the field and they've done improvements every year for the past 2-3 years. The product on the field has been much better but the problem is that it is not consistent. I truly feel if we hadn't been hit by the injury truck last year, we would have won at least 7 games but we will never know. We lead the SBC once again in attendance and are almost certain to do so this year especially with Kansas St. coming into town. Also, you are not shy about your feelings of the current administration. How is it easy to judge them when our president has been in office for not even a year yet and Scott Farmer has been in barely longer. I know that David Walker has been here for a bit but I don't think he truly calls many of the shots.
My initial post was to point out that while it is often difficult to judge these classes at this level, you do need to be disappointed in the overall view of the class itself. We have a couple of guys who will be big contributors for a few years but I am a bit concerned. It was also a bit alarming to see a team that is just entering D-1 play get some highly touted guys.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)