when you play in the SEC you dont need 3 or 4 other brutal games...
I understand the rationale for both of our schedules, but I wish we played a little better and the Cajuns played a little easier.
As an LSU fan for what I am paying for tickets I wd prefer at least one high profile OCC opponent at home (e.g., like Va Tech)-its especially bad in our off years when we go on the road to Auburn and Fla. This year, at least we have a good road trip if you want to take advantage of it and go to the game in Seattle.
Though I understand the need for money-I wish the Cajuns cd back off the money games. Played them better this year-but the 2 losses-especially if by large margins-puts the damper on fan interest and enthusiasm and while I know the players enjoy the competition-it can't be fun spotting 2 games.
As for the Pac 10-at least USC gets their share of the bias. They have a great program, but watching Herbie and Brent cover USC sometimes I wonder sometimes.
Our OOC schedules in the past few yrs have included the likes of Oregon St, Arizona, Arizona St, VT, and this year Washington. Maybe not murders row, but when you normally see 5 or so ranked teams in your SEC schedule...it works for me and it hasn't done too badly in the eyes that count...the BCS.
I think the Cajuns are between a rock and a hard place with the money games. I don't know what you do with that one.
I don't have any problem with USC, but the Big 10 is a different case. They need to get their football act together.
Very good post (see I can be civil to a&m@br fans on the off ocassions that they make sense)... Rather than moan and groan about USC who does earn their stripes with their OOC schedule, the Big Ten is the real joke and yet year in year out they are in the BCS version of the NC game... Had Penn State not gotten beat by a last second FG the Big Ten would again have been represented in that one
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)