Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 49 to 60 of 83

Thread: Tech's Intervention

  1. #49

    USL (1960-1983)  (1985-1998) Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajun Saint View Post
    _ just some silly questions for you-why in the hell do you give a damn about us? what do you know about us? have you ever set foot in cajun field? are you a ul fan? do you attend our home football games on a regular basis? do you need to use more than one hand to count the cajuns' fans you consider to be close friends? do you have any idea what passion many of us here have for our football team? you have not furthered this discourse one damn bit. you are merely an antagonistic twithead. go post on a message board for a team you actually support, if there is one, and leave us the hell alone. _
    I like to push your buttons which with regards to ULL fans is not hard. I know enough to know that you don't average more than 15,000 PAID attendance per game if that. PAID attendance means the fannies that show up in the seats each game not season tickets sold who don't show up to the game. Yes I have been to your games plus I can read the paper where attendance is printed to know you guys really support your team. Average 75% of your staduim capacity and that shows me true support.

  2. #50

    USL (1960-1983)  (1985-1998) Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by DestinCajun View Post
    _ I'm a long time supporter of UL football that's how. Despite being elite and in an elite conference and having elite fans like you, LaTex attendance is in line with ours. Not better - especially during squirrel season. _
    I am not a Louisiana Tech fan and you are probably right about their average attentance. I know what yours is for a 31K staduim from 2000 to 2007 latest stats you average 14,949. That amounts to only 48% of the capacity of your stadium. I do love the squirrel season remark though that was a good one!!!!!

  3. #51

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by KAjunRaider View Post
    _
    http://www.theadvertiser.com/article...812080324/1006


    "Our selection committee was asked to list order of preference of teams a few days ago," Independence Bowl media relations director Patrick Meehan wrote via e-mail. "Notre Dame was first, North Carolina State was second, Western Michigan was third, Northern Illinois was fourth and Arkansas State and (UL) tied at the bottom of the order.
    I wonder how many of the I-bowl selection committee members were involved in the failed back-room politics attempt to lure the Top 28 out of Lafayette. IMO the lingering ill-feelings from that loss influenced the committee as much as a former employee pushing for his team.

  4. #52

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by dt68la View Post
    _ I wonder how many of the I-bowl selection committee members were involved in the failed back-room politics attempt to lure the Top 28 out of Lafayette. IMO the lingering ill-feelings from that loss influenced the committee as much as a former employee pushing for his team. _
    DING DING DING we have a winner.

  5. #53

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    ..


  6. #54

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunZ1 View Post
    _ It just goes to show you how terrible the perception of UL is. That is the most depressing thing for me.

    At the end of the day, a MAC school from N. Illinois that will bring a thousand or so fans is more attractive to a bowl than UL, who would bring 15-20k.

    We are the ugliest girl on the dance floor (and we're not dancing). _
    Hold on a minute. We couldnt bring 800 fans to Troy with a SunBelt championship on the line but we are sure that we would have brought 20,000 to Shreveport for a game against La. Tech?

    I think your number is highly inflated. The only time we ever traveled big was for those fun games against Tulane in the superdome almost 20 years ago. More than half of those fans were there for the party in New Orleans.

  7. #55
    CajunZ1's Avatar CajunZ1 is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Fan for Sure

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunBoudin View Post
    _ Hold on a minute. We couldnt bring 800 fans to Troy with a SunBelt championship on the line but we are sure that we would have brought 20,000 to Shreveport for a game against La. Tech?

    I think your number is highly inflated. The only time we ever traveled big was for those fun games against Tulane in the superdome almost 20 years ago. More than half of those fans were there for the party in New Orleans. _
    First of all, I said 15-20k.

    And yes, our first bowl bid IN 38 YEARS would garner enough interest to bring at least 15k fans the short drive to Shreveport. I say this because we ALL saw what happened after some mild on-the-field success (see 29k+ at the FIU homecoming game).

    Traveling to Troy is one thing. Going to a Bowl game is another entirely. ESPECIALLY one so close in proximity.

    After typing all that^, I realize this is a stupid argument. We'll never know. But I choose to believe 15k is realistic, 20k+ is (would have been) a possibility.
    You may choose to believe otherwise. You have my permission!

  8. #56

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by DestinCajun View Post
    I did read your post which is why I figured you have to be a Latextser. Otherwise, you would know something about Cajun fans and how much they would support our team in a bowl game EVEN in place like Shreveport.
    Cajun home attendance was over 21000 this year and that led the SBC. Worst crowd we had was 15000 and that was on a Wed. night. We would have had over 20000 had that been on Saturday. Also, the only other game under 20000 was 18000 for Kent State. A tremendous rainstorm shortly before kickoff hurt attendance in that game.

  9. #57

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by RaginFan2 View Post
    I disagree that we were never in the UTEP game. We had the early lead and were still in it going into the second half. However, I can agree that we did not play well on either side of the ball for the better part of the game.
    Losing Daylon McCoy on defense right before half is why we struggled on defense against UTEP in the 2nd half Our backup QB was also unavailable that night and that also hurt us.

  10. #58

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajunsmike View Post
    _ Losing Daylon McCoy on defense right before half is why we struggled on defense against UTEP in the 2nd half Our backup QB was also unavailable that night and that also hurt us. _
    You are correct! Also, the coaching was problematic. I really didn't see good adjustments being made. Maybe they were made, but whatever they were, they didn't work.

  11. #59

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by RaginFan2 View Post
    You are correct! Also, the coaching was problematic. I really didn't see good adjustments being made. Maybe they were made, but whatever they were, they didn't work. _
    Here's another POV. The problem was an inability to execute by our players with injuries (like Mike D) and those we had on the field as substitutes for our starters. UTEP was definitely beatable. Coaching, playcalling, the alignment of the stars and planets over Cajun Field really had little to do with the outcome.

  12. #60

    Default Re: Tech's Intervention

    Quote Originally Posted by DestinCajun View Post
    _ Here's another POV. The problem was an inability to execute by our players with injuries (like Mike D) and those we had on the field as substitutes for our starters. UTEP was definitely beatable. Coaching, playcalling, the alignment of the stars and planets over Cajun Field really had little to do with the outcome. _
    That's exactly my point! The coaches, after seeing Dez unable t execute, should have tried other approaches. I know Maguire was hurt, too, and that Masson didn't have game experience. But at least they could've tried him for s few series. Also, maybe run the "Wild Chery" formation more. Something, anything to try to spark the offense. I think the lack of offense (in several games) put too much pressure on our defense. Anyway, that's water under the bridge.

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •