Maybe so. Maybe there's no amount of money we could offer to keep him here. But it would be a huge failure on the part of this administration if we didn't at least beat whatever Sam Houston is willing to give him. If we can find 6 million to fund an expansion, but can't find ~100k to keep a great coach, there's something very wrong with our priorities.
This guy has been a huge key to our recent success in baseball. If we want these good times to continue, we absolutely must find a way to keep talented guys like him on staff.
I have heard Coach Robe say on more than one occasion that the best thing that can happen for his Baseball program is for the Football program to be successful! He is a smart man and seems to always see the big picture. I'm sure he wants his share of the pie and he deserves to get it. But he knows full well that Football does indeed drive the bus. Hopefully the bus will deliver a gift to his doorstep in the very near future!!!
Coach Robe has been coaching a long time. Now that his sons are finished playing for him, will he continue to coach for a few more years? Does AD type of work appeal more to him now? Could we keep Deggs for a couple of years as a coach in waiting if such is the case with Robe? Just asking.
As I recall, you were against the numbers of seats in the stadium expansion. You wanted to spend the money on better amenities. "That" is what you were talking about. The funds being raised for facility improvements have no relationship to Robe and/or Deggs or anyone else's salaries. You do realize that not only has Mark Hudspeth remained at UL under the premise that we are expanding the stadium, but also Robe is not expecting to divert dollars expected to improve the Tigue to go to coaching salaries.
I don't believe the approval process for facilities funding includes a caveat that says, "unless you instead need to increase salaries".
And futhermore, we don't need to increase any coaching salaries if we don't improve/expand our facilities.
Muschamp was coach in waiting...until something better came along. It means nothing, the term is non-binding. All assistants are "in-waiting"
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)