2008 Bowl Season Louisiana Snubbed by Indi Bowl

[RaginFan2]

_ Still surprised to hear that the SBC AD's did not get copies of the "agreement". _

I agree. It should have been done so that all SBC member institutions can be aware of the obligations and requirements of the conference contracts. Or maybe the university presidents' office got a copy but not the AD??? That wouldn't be logical, but ...

[RaginFan2]

_ You are correct. Arkstfan pointed it out also. My eyes must have been crossing when I got to that point lol. _

Yeah, I'm a little slow on the keyboard!

[rgncjn12]

_ Do we have a lawyer here who specializes in NCAA laws. _

NELSON SHEXNIAYDER! Hahahahahaha!

Where is he hiding? Isn't his position some sort of legal position with UL? He does have a law degree.

GEAUX UL!

[Boomer]

_ You are correct. Arkstfan pointed it out also. My eyes must have been crossing when I got to that point lol. _

Hey after my 2 months at Loyola Law School back in the late 60s---I offer this---If the contract is silent on 6-6 teams and the Bowl's having to select a SBC 6-6---ergo it is the Bowl's preference of whom they want to invite--seems that one could argue that the spirit and intent was for the 7-5 rule to filter down to the 6-6ers if in fact no 7-5ers were available. Glad I didn't stay in school!!!!!

[Bankruptcyman]

_ Hey after my 2 months at Loyola Law School back in the late 60s---I offer this---If the contract is silent on 6-6 teams and the Bowl's having to select a SBC 6-6---ergo it is the Bowl's preference of whom they want to invite--seems that one could argue that the spirit and intent was for the 7-5 rule to filter down to the 6-6ers if in fact no 7-5ers were available. Glad I didn't stay in school!!!!! _

Me too!!!!

[UL_Cajuns]

_ And I really hope we've redone our "UL commercial" since the last time I saw it. It was pretty bad.

All in all a bowl game would be a terrific opportunity to market some of our successes. CajunFun-you should try to get in contact with some of our marketing people about all the academic accomplishments UL has garnered recently. Just give them your website address. _

YOU mean the one where it ends with goooooooo cajuns.
Everything was good on that commercial except the end! LOL!

[DrumRoll]

There shall be no contingency agreements with other sponsoring bowl organizations intended to enable an institution with a record of six wins and six losses to become eligible for those contests.

I believe this clause is only intended to preclude anyone from entering into an agreement that exclusively includes teams with 6 wins...

[Arkstfan]

If you are an attorney, you would be horrified at what passes for contracts in the athletic world. The typical contract is a letter that says something like this.

"Dear Bubba:
This is to confirm our telephone conversation that we will play on Sept. 8, 2009 at our stadium and we will pay XYZ State $700,000 for the game. Please sign and return."

If you ever poke around the NCAA web site (they've started closing some of the directories and its not nearly as interesting as it used to be) you can sometimes stumble upon "official interpretations". That's where the NCAA answers questions about rules (not game rules, the NCAA rules). You read the question. The rule. The decision. You scratch your head, read it all again and then have to shrug your shoulders and move on because it makes absolutely no sense.

[rhineaux]

_ I hate to get too heavy into this subject(mainly because I am not passionate about it). My only beef is that it seem to have a low production value. FWIW, I like Boomer's ideas. _

Exactly. Well Put.

If you watch UL's commercial during a game, and then watch something from another school, you would see that UL's commercial looks like it was done by some students with student equipment, whereas others were done by professionals with professional equipment. If this thing was done by students so that the school could get something done on the cheap, then the administrators need to rethink their plan. Nothing against our students, but they lack the experience of a professional firm, and also lack the equiment. If that commercial WAS done by a professional firm, then we got screwed and we need to hire a real firm to do another one.

I remember watching the UH v. Marshall game a few weeks ago, and being very impressed with their commercials. I'm not sure if you can find them, but those are two that UL's could be modeled after.

[cjr3888]

_ If you are an attorney, you would be horrified at what passes for contracts in the athletic world. The typical contract is a letter that says something like this.

"Dear Bubba:
This is to confirm our telephone conversation that we will play on Sept. 8, 2009 at our stadium and we will pay XYZ State $700,000 for the game. Please sign and return."

If you ever poke around the NCAA web site (they've started closing some of the directories and its not nearly as interesting as it used to be) you can sometimes stumble upon "official interpretations". That's where the NCAA answers questions about rules (not game rules, the NCAA rules). You read the question. The rule. The decision. You scratch your head, read it all again and then have to shrug your shoulders and move on because it makes absolutely no sense. _

That's one reason I dont give much weight the the fact that Troy must go to the New Orleans Bowl if they are the only 8-4 team. The NCAA by-laws state they must, but weirder things have happened in the past. What it all boils down to is the fact that the NCAA has plenty of rules and by-laws, BUT they can change them whenever and however they want.