LU is the way to go. They would have to use Louisiana. Until someone sends us to court, that is what we do.It doesn't say if the city tag with each university is their official name or not, but I suspect it is not, just a reference. I would bet LA Tech would fight having to use at Ruston with their name, but see no problem with our being required to. Also, the law requires two schools to have the University of Louisiana name and both must use the city tag. And any use of "University of" or "UL" requires the city tag. The law is very specific and that is all it addresses. So, when we use Louisiana, we are not in violation of the law because we haven't used "University of" Louisiana. When we use UL alone, we are in violation of the law because we don't include Lafayette. So, what other abbreviation would not be in violation of the law? How about LU? It in no way implies University of Louisiana.
If we are not going to try and change our name to Louisiana University and I can understand why we would not, we can get by legally with Louisiana and LU. Of course, that requires everyone to change from UL to LU. Seems like a small sacrifice to stay legal and finally get a completely legal reference that we want. No more UL-L, UL Lafayette, Louisiana Lafayette, U La La, Lafayette, U Laf, Laf, LL, and any other variation we all have seen.
Why can't we all get on the same page on something like this and adopt something that, although it may violate the spirit of the law as someone stated, is clearly legal and something we can use NOW? We would certainly be in good company with other universities who do the same thing, i.e. University of Oklahoma, OU, University of Kansas, KU, and University of Colorado, CU. It is time to end the madness.