It doesn't say if the city tag with each university is their official name or not, but I suspect it is not, just a reference. I would bet LA Tech would fight having to use at Ruston with their name, but see no problem with our being required to. Also, the law requires two schools to have the University of Louisiana name and both must use the city tag. And any use of "University of" or "UL" requires the city tag. The law is very specific and that is all it addresses. So, when we use Louisiana, we are not in violation of the law because we haven't used "University of" Louisiana. When we use UL alone, we are in violation of the law because we don't include Lafayette. So, what other abbreviation would not be in violation of the law? How about LU? It in no way implies University of Louisiana.
If we are not going to try and change our name to Louisiana University and I can understand why we would not, we can get by legally with Louisiana and LU. Of course, that requires everyone to change from UL to LU. Seems like a small sacrifice to stay legal and finally get a completely legal reference that we want. No more UL-L, UL Lafayette, Louisiana Lafayette, U La La, Lafayette, U Laf, Laf, LL, and any other variation we all have seen.
Why can't we all get on the same page on something like this and adopt something that, although it may violate the spirit of the law as someone stated, is clearly legal and something we can use NOW? We would certainly be in good company with other universities who do the same thing, i.e. University of Oklahoma, OU, University of Kansas, KU, and University of Colorado, CU. It is time to end the madness.
1) There's no law protecting "Texas", and they certainly don't need one.
2) A law is the only thing protecting AGAINST The University of Louisiana being officially and 100% "The University of Louisiana".
3) So what if someone gets mad as hell about being double LL'd? What's wrong with being passionate about this issue?
The only people that would have a problem with that kind of passion are those that are on the other side of this fight. Those that stay silent are no worse than neutral.
But you have spoken- "I'm a ULL graduate and I couldn't possibly be more tired of this dumb@ss name thing. I understand you want us to be called Louisiana or UL. And I truly don't care if you use that name or ULL..."
Texas is in fact a protected trademark of the University of Texas Austin. No other university can legally describe itself as "Texas."
And I still couldn't be more tired of it. The problem with getting mad as hell with someone for being double LL'd is people like Ben McDonald literally don't know going in what to call the university. It can't possibly be a good representation of the school to rip his head off and then claim you're just passionate.
And yeah, I have spoken, and I still couldn't be more tired of people acting like children when somebody doesn't use the name they want when there are plenty of acceptable reasons why they might say University of Louisiana at Lafayette. The only arguments I've posted about the name were saying that outsiders sometimes have a legitimate reason for using the non-preferred names and it doesn't do us any good to act like jerks to them. Of course, the second I mentioned the name at all, the exact people I was talking about jumped all over it without really understanding what I was saying. I'm all for raising the prestige of the university as much as possible, but stomping your feet around and screaming at people isn't going to help, and will only fuel the people that want to hinder the university.
A small sacrifice for a national identity. I think the hand signs originated in the SWC with the Longhorn sign. Other schools like UH and Texas Tech tried to copy and have some unrecognizable signs. It doesn't work for most schools. While UL is a neat hand sign, it is likely recognized only by UL fans. Hate to lose it, but LU will take us to a much higher recognition. Other than Lamar and Liberty, can you think of another LU school?
It was a law without principle.
Principles require logical reasoning.
Back in 1984 they never broached the principle behind why UL didn't deserve to be THE University of Louisiana.
In 1995 they never broached the principle behind why there needed to be two.
So in the end the largest school in the system could not be the one, but it absolutely did not matter how small the second school was. The smallest school in the system could have been the 2nd one.
The unprincipled name rule.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)