I can't evaluate Scott Farmer as an AD. I don't have enough concrete information to determine his level of involvement in our successes, lost opportunities or outright failures. I'm also not real sure what his skills are in comparison to other ADs. From the pure "where were we before Scott arrived... and where are we now?" he'd have to be given high marks. Some of the issues that have occurred during his time at UL have bothered me. I struggle, however, to understand the facts... since so many have given contrary versions of what he's either said or done.
I do believe that Mark Hudspeth being such a refreshing grand ambassador for UL athletics (much less a great football coach) has masked and muted concerns that I believe would have surfaced in our athletic funding, facilities, and fan support launches. But, with Hud's great positive UL public persona, so much else has been assisted, even a bad AD could simply stay out of the way of the progress... and we'd keep improving.
Coaching abilities hasn't been an issue for several years... so I measure our AD right now by our funding work (not just whether our funds are improving - but are we maximizing our campaign), our facilities improvement progress (the little he may or may not control), and our conference affiliation (I want to know he's doing the legwork to build the bridge that will get us to the next better available membership). Winning games is on the coaches - and we're doing that - so the work of funding... and conference improvement... can be a main focal point of a good AD at UL.