Warren Nolan and Boyd have received some criticism in the past because their RPI calculations were at times well off ... resulting in several ranking spots in some cases. But when the RPI formula was changed for 2013 to remove the RPI Top 25/50/75 and RPI Bottom 75/50/25 bonuses and penalties, the RPI became much simpler to calculate. Now the only thing they are missing are the non-D1 game penalties (max games allowed exceeded as well as losses) and in the case of Boyd, tie games. While the actual RPI calcs are a little off on Warren Nolan due to some erroneous game results here and there, the rankings are very close ... if not exact at times.
Brian
If the Cajuns win tomorrow, it is not an issue. The Cajuns would be a lock for a Top 8 RPI.
There are also two teams in front of the Cajuns that could drop with losses ... Indiana and Florida State (though Florida State may not drop much ... or at all with a loss to Virginia). So, the Cajuns could conceivably finish as high as #3 ... provided Oregon State does not pass the Cajuns by winning their final two games vs. USC. The Cajuns could still possibly finish ahead of Oregon State in that scenario.
That is how fluid this is ...
Brian
Oh no need to explain, I've been a Warren Nolan follower for years. I was simply stating how ridiculous Karl's comment was that he was trying to downplay WarrenNolan.com. He clearly had never even heard of it before and that's why he had no clue as to what he was talking about.
Karl benson should've had a warren Nolan window open on his cell phone for the last month and refreshed it 3 times a day. Warren something.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)