Look, I like Jake, but to say he should have been starting for the Saints since 2000 is just plain silly. Like him or not, Aaron Brooks actually had some very good years with the Saints. And I hate Aaron Brooks, so don't think I'm some Haslett apologist.
Anyway, there's only one way to settle this argument and that's by presenting unbiased statistical information on each player. Choose wisely (and no cheating by looking up players stats to try to figure out who averages what):
Player X (from parts unknown)
17.26 completions per game
28.96 attempts per game
209.56 yards per game
1.38 TDs per game
0.907 INT per game
Player Y (from parts unknown)
21.44 completions per game
33.39 attempts per game
238.98 yards per game
1.5 TDs per game
0.907 INT per game
Player Z (from parts unknown)
17.98 completions per game
31.86 attempts per game
217.86 yards per game
1.32 TDs per game
0.98 INT per game
P.S. I didn't include the "Just Win" category, because that is really a moot point in the NFL. All three players have been surrounded by completely different casts at various points in their careers, and all have won and lost in those situations. In fact, their overall records are VERY similar if you take out their best and worst seasons of their careers and average it out.