If you can't see the difference between expecting the NCAA to stay true to its history and screw our softball program with its seeding, and calling a team "Brokebackettes," then I don't know what to tell you.
Maybe you've forgotten the top 20 softball team the NCAA shipped to Arizona as a FOUR SEED in a 6 team regional. I haven't. Neither has Arizona.
Calling teams Brokebackettes? That's what kids on middle school playgrounds do.
Only Mercer, with an RPI of 41, got screwed worse than McNeese [46].
Of course, they knew going in that the Southland was a 1 bid league.
I don't think that was true. A lot of people had McNeese as one of the bubble teams and one of the last four out. Not a surprise that they didn't make it but to say they were a one bid league outright isn't correct. They were definitely in the hunt up to the last day.
I actually would have liked to see them make it. I don't think they stand a chance to compete with us year in and year out but it would be good to have a few programs around us that consistently produce winning teams. This gives us an opportunity to schedule close games against competition that helps our rpi.
Let's see...top 20 ranked team that was not ranked that high in the RPI in 2004 (Final 2004 NittyGritty report had us at #23). They were actually the 5 seed in an 8 team regional. We also eliminated #1 overall seed Arizona in that regional and advanced all the way to the if necessary game of that regional. Put us as the 2 or 3 seed in that regional and what does it change? Nothing.
Don't let those facts get in the way of you expecting them to 'screw' us, which is apparently their sole mission. The NCAA doesn't consistently screw us. The RPI did in the past, but thanks to Coach Lotief and Brian, the program has adapted and has learned to use the system to use the RPI to our advantage.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)