Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 55

Thread: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

  1. Default Re: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

    Quote Originally Posted by jllanclos View Post
    The case using the criteria says that we should NOT have gotten a top 8 national seed in 2012, and that we ABSOLUTELY, WITHOUT QUESTION, should get one this year.
    And we did not receive a Top 8 National Seed in 2012 ... nor should we have expected to (I did not). We should have been seeded a little higher.

    Quote Originally Posted by jllanclos View Post
    When our name comes up at #9 or 10 tomorrow night, just chalk it up to this: if we traded resumes with a team that had a name across their chest (like "Oklahoma,") we'd be a top 8 national seed.
    No doubt.

    Quote Originally Posted by jllanclos View Post
    We're all going to be p*ssed tomorrow night. If I'm wrong, pull this thread back up and everybody can flog me. I'd be happy to be wrong, but the softball committee isn't interested in awarding the top 8 teams in the country national seeds if one of those 8 teams is "Louisiana-Lafayette."

    The softball committee is Lucy holding the football, and we're Charlie Brown. I'm not getting all geeked about finally kicking that football.
    You are huddled in the corner right now ... aren't you?

    Brian

  2. #14

    Default Re: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

    I think UL gets the national seed - based on the criteria and the cold hard facts. I think the trump card is 2-1 head to head. Road record and # 6 non-conference RPI also help.

    Do we expect South Alabama to get a host slot for regionals? Maybe LSU could be sent there?


  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajun Soldier View Post
    I don't understand how you play the schedule, win the games set yourself up to be a top 8 national seed. Finish with a top 8 RPI and still possibly not be a top eight national seed. If we met the criteria and don't get it then why play the games (tongue in cheek). This is crazy we are an over achieving young team and deserve that top 8 National seed. It sickens me to think we might lose out to someone we beat head to head on the diamond.
    I'd it comes down to it, the fact that we beat them head to head will put us over the too IMO

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajun Soldier View Post
    I don't understand how you play the schedule, win the games set yourself up to be a top 8 national seed. Finish with a top 8 RPI and still possibly not be a top eight national seed. If we met the criteria and don't get it then why play the games (tongue in cheek). This is crazy we are an over achieving young team and deserve that top 8 National seed. It sickens me to think we might lose out to someone we beat head to head on the diamond.
    I'd it comes down to it, the fact that we beat them head to head will put us over the top IMO

  5. Default Re: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunDreDog View Post
    Agree.

    Again, thanks for all you do. I know we all appreciate it very much and it makes us all that much better fans of the diamond sports. I could barely spell RPI years ago, and now I can.
    LOL. You are welcome.

    Brian

  6. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin View Post
    You are huddled in the corner right now ... aren't you?

    Brian
    No... but ask me again tomorrow at about 8:59.

  7. #19

    Default Re: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

    Did anyone think the Oklahoma series would possibly separate us from each other for a top 8 national seed when it happened? WOW.


  8. Default Re: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

    Quote Originally Posted by cajundiehard View Post
    I think UL gets the national seed - based on the criteria and the cold hard facts. I think the trump card is 2-1 head to head. Road record and # 6 non-conference RPI also help.

    Do we expect South Alabama to get a host slot for regionals? Maybe LSU could be sent there?
    No, I do not think South Alabama will have the RPI to host. Besides, there are plenty of hosts in that part of the country. I look for Minnesota (Won the Big 10 tournament over Michigan and has a Top 16 RPI) to host in the north ... and possibly Michigan (Tied Nebraska for the Big 10 regular season title).

  9. Default Re: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin View Post
    But the selection committee has gone out of their way to not use the polls in past years. It has been RPI, RPI, and RPI ... and of course conference finish. They were ranked #6 in the polls at selection time in 2012 ... with a #12 RPI. Are you saying they reverse?

    Brian
    I thought UL had the #1 OOC RPI in the country that year?

    Are you telling me that if a Team USA (type team) had played UL's schedule in 2012 they would have been a 12 seed?

  10. UL Softball Re: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    I thought UL had the #1 OOC RPI in the country that year?

    Are you telling me that if a Team USA (type team) had played UL's schedule in 2012 they would have been a 12 seed?
    #1 NC RPI, yes. But #12 RPI overall.

    Team USA would have had fewer losses.

    Brian

  11. #23

    Default Re: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

    Looks like McNeese will need that at large bid. Kaylee Guidry (NWST) is no hitting the Cowgirls in the bottom of the 4th inning, it's 8-0.


  12. #24

    Default Re: Top 8 National Seed Comparison ...

    1. Louisiana (#9 national seed)
    2. LSU
    3. NW St
    4. Texas Southern

    Paired with #8 Oklahoma


Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. RPI and National Seed selections
    By GoneGolfin in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 23rd, 2014, 06:41 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •