Hawk, in many industries now... we are paying veterans strictly to teach the "up and coming" their veteran skills and knowledge. You are speaking from a position that you are currently in. And that position has been prevasive in the U.S. for a couple of decades. There is a massive amount of reflection (especially at the large corporate level) that the lack of specifically hiring and/or retaining veterans for the sole purpose of transferring their skills and knowledge to the up and coming... has destroyed a generation and a half of our work force. Many are in a correction mode.
The position you're talking about is still going to exist in large part... but to say there isn't a massive push to transfer veteran knowledge and skills directly in the work units (that you would say are all competing for the same employment) is absolutely false. When you reward people more for the measurable transfer of knowledge and skills to their less skilled associates, higher than you would their direct application of those skills, they do not hoard their abilities. Some people actually get the fact that you could do without them in the direct application far above the need you have to use them as a mentor.
"Departmental Accounting" probably isn't a good example of how the rest of the world operates.
The guy is Tayvon Austin. Remember the guy that was a Homerun hitter, steal of the draft? How'd that work out..
But those people are called...SUPERVISORS. Not fellow employees.
The crux of the matter is and always will be is that employers almost expect someone to help along all of the other baby chicks...for no compensation. If you do go the extra mile...you get no reward for your generosity. That is the current corporate world we live in. I see no change coming. Unless you make me a supervisor and pay me the money to teach them...they are on their own.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)