Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: RPI and National Seed selections

  1. UL Softball RPI and National Seed selections

    The below illustrates how closely the Softball Top 8 seeds as selected by the Softball Selection Committee matches the RPI Top 8. In 2011 and 2012, all of the Top 8 RPI were Top 8 seed selections. In 2013, #5 RPI Alabama and #6 RPI LSU missed out on national seeds due to their 5th and 4th place respective conference finishes. Also note that Alabama was a poor 8-11 vs. the RPI Top 25. Whereas Tennessee (#9 RPI) finished 3rd in the SEC and was selected as a Top 8 seed . and Arizona State tied for 2nd in the Pac-12 and was the conference's second Top 8 seed selection. The Sun Devils were also 13-5 vs. the RPI Top 25.

    2013
    #1 Oklahoma (#1 RPI) . 1st place in #3 RPI Conference (Big 12) 10-3 vs. T25, 25-4 vs. T50
    #2 Florida (#2 RPI) . 1st place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 14-3 vs. T25, 25-6 vs. T50
    #3 Oregon (#4 RPI) . 1st place in #2 RPI Conference (Pac-12) 13-8 vs. T25, 22-8 vs. T50
    #4 Texas (#3 RPI) . 2nd place in #3 RPI Conference (Big 12) 6-4 vs. T25, 20-5 vs. T50
    #5 Arizona State (#11 RPI) . T2nd in #2 RPI Conference (Pac-12) 13-5 vs. T25, 21-8 vs. T50
    #6 Missouri (#7 RPI) . 3rd place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 12-9 vs. T25, 17-10 vs. T50
    #7 Tennessee (#9 RPI) . 2nd place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 8-8 vs. T25, 16-9 vs. T50
    #8 Michigan (#8 RPI) . 1st place in #4 RPI Conference (Big Ten) 6-6 vs. T25, 17-9 vs. T50
    --
    #9 LSU (#6 RPI) . 4th place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 13-8 vs. T25, 20-14 vs. T50
    #10 Alabama (#5 RPI) 5th place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 8-11 vs. T25, 18-12 vs. T50

    All national seeds in 2013 came from the Top 4 RPI Conferences. The Sun Belt has displaced the Big Ten in 2014 as the #4 RPI Conference.

    2012
    #1 California (#1 RPI)
    #2 Alabama (#2 RPI)
    #3 Arizona State (#3 RPI)
    #4 Oklahoma (#6 RPI)
    #5 Florida (#7 RPI)
    #6 Texas (#5 RPI)
    #7 Tennessee (#4 RPI)
    #8 Texas A&M (#8 RPI)

    All national seeds in 2012 came from the Top 3 RPI Conferences.

    2011
    #1 Arizona State (#1 RPI)
    #2 Alabama (#4 RPI)
    #3 Texas (#3 RPI)
    #4 Florida (#6 RPI)
    #5 Missouri (#5 RPI)
    #6 Georgia (#2 RPI)
    #7 California (#7 RPI)
    #8 Arizona (#8 RPI)

    All national seeds in 2011 came from the Top 3 RPI Conferences.

    Brian


  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin View Post
    The below illustrates how closely the Softball Top 8 seeds as selected by the Softball Selection Committee matches the RPI Top 8. In 2011 and 2012, all of the Top 8 RPI were Top 8 seed selections. In 2013, #5 RPI Alabama and #6 RPI LSU missed out on national seeds due to their 5th and 4th place respective conference finishes. Also note that Alabama was a poor 8-11 vs. the RPI Top 25. Whereas Tennessee (#9 RPI) finished 3rd in the SEC and was selected as a Top 8 seed . and Arizona State tied for 2nd in the Pac-12 and was the conference's second Top 8 seed selection. The Sun Devils were also 13-5 vs. the RPI Top 25.

    2013
    #1 Oklahoma (#1 RPI) . 1st place in #3 RPI Conference (Big 12) 10-3 vs. T25, 25-4 vs. T50
    #2 Florida (#2 RPI) . 1st place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 14-3 vs. T25, 25-6 vs. T50
    #3 Oregon (#4 RPI) . 1st place in #2 RPI Conference (Pac-12) 13-8 vs. T25, 22-8 vs. T50
    #4 Texas (#3 RPI) . 2nd place in #3 RPI Conference (Big 12) 6-4 vs. T25, 20-5 vs. T50
    #5 Arizona State (#11 RPI) . T2nd in #2 RPI Conference (Pac-12) 13-5 vs. T25, 21-8 vs. T50
    #6 Missouri (#7 RPI) . 3rd place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 12-9 vs. T25, 17-10 vs. T50
    #7 Tennessee (#9 RPI) . 2nd place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 8-8 vs. T25, 16-9 vs. T50
    #8 Michigan (#8 RPI) . 1st place in #4 RPI Conference (Big Ten) 6-6 vs. T25, 17-9 vs. T50
    --
    #9 LSU (#6 RPI) . 4th place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 13-8 vs. T25, 20-14 vs. T50
    #10 Alabama (#5 RPI) 5th place in #1 RPI Conference (SEC) 8-11 vs. T25, 18-12 vs. T50

    All national seeds in 2013 came from the Top 4 RPI Conferences. The Sun Belt has displaced the Big Ten in 2014 as the #4 RPI Conference.

    2012
    #1 California (#1 RPI)
    #2 Alabama (#2 RPI)
    #3 Arizona State (#3 RPI)
    #4 Oklahoma (#6 RPI)
    #5 Florida (#7 RPI)
    #6 Texas (#5 RPI)
    #7 Tennessee (#4 RPI)
    #8 Texas A&M (#8 RPI)

    All national seeds in 2012 came from the Top 3 RPI Conferences.

    2011
    #1 Arizona State (#1 RPI)
    #2 Alabama (#4 RPI)
    #3 Texas (#3 RPI)
    #4 Florida (#6 RPI)
    #5 Missouri (#5 RPI)
    #6 Georgia (#2 RPI)
    #7 California (#7 RPI)
    #8 Arizona (#8 RPI)

    All national seeds in 2011 came from the Top 3 RPI Conferences.

    Brian
    This is what I mean. This is just lazy. About time someone asked why they get credit for doing all this supposed "research" for the whole freaking year, then just spit out the RPI, swap #3 with #6 for appearance's sake, and call it a weekend.

    Give me a break. Lazy. Scott Farmer included, because he participated in this (and endorsed it) for 2 years.

  3. UL Softball Re: RPI and National Seed selections

    Scott even 'felt good about the Cajuns seeding'. You talk about the ultimate "yes man"!


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Top 8 National Seed Comparison .
    By GoneGolfin in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: May 12th, 2014, 09:21 am
  2. NCAA softball selections Cajuns #14 seed
    By Cajun90 in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: May 14th, 2012, 11:05 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •