No. What he is saying is whoever does the schedule needs to schedule perennially winning teams in bad conferences.
No. What he is saying is whoever does the schedule needs to schedule perennially winning teams in bad conferences.
No ... Cal-Irvine was #1 in two of the polls at selection time in 2009. The selection committee awarded them a #6 seed. This was also during an era where the selection committee gave the West coast some leniency when it came to the RPI (they are aware of the regional bias) and teams (especially from the Pac-10, but CSF as well) earned national seeds with RPIs well outside of the Top 8. But things tightened up considerably beginning with the 2010 season.
I updated my prior post with some interesting data points from 2010->2013.
And BTW, the Cajuns could certainly finish Top 8 in RPI if they win the remainder of their games. But that is not happening.
Brian
And we all know that baseball schedules further out than softball, making it more difficult. But improvements can still be made within those constraints. And just because a team is on the schedule one or two years out, it does not mean that you cannot make some adjustments. You can also either leave a spot or two open on the schedule to add a game or two during the season ... making yourself available to a team that may have a rainout or otherwise an open spot themselves. There are some creative things that can be done to improve the situation. I am not a "can't do it person". There is always a way.
Brian
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)