He called it golf elbow, no structural damage just sore but could linger if not rested.
Certainly there are big problems with it … as I have discussed ad nauseum for several years. But if you had to summarize all of these problems succinctly, you can simply say that RPI does a poor job of evaluating SOS … which is the principal component of the formula (nearly 75%).
If by "gaming the system" you mean simply maintaining the existing system … then yes. The system is already in their favor and they obtain these advantages by simply doing nothing … except ensuring that it stays in place.
But I have a different definition of gaming the system (RPI). Because of the formula, there are many angles available to use the system to your advantage (if you really understand the system).
I want to be clear that it can certainly be legitimate for a team to have a 27-8 record … or a 20-10 record for that matter … and be considered a Top 8 team. It all depends on the strength of schedule played. The problem is that RPI does not measure SOS well.
As for Ole Miss being a national seed … if the season ended today, they would not be a national seed. Alabama and South Carolina would be national seeds from the SEC … with Florida/Kentucky/Vanderbilt as a possible third. Stanford would not make the field of 64 … as they do not have a winning record. Stanford is where they are RPI-wise because they played a brutal non-conference schedule. Their overall SOS is #2 in the country. They have not yet ventured far into their Pac-12 schedule.
Brian
Back to the thread, nothing on their "geaux cowboys" site about game. Thought some broke back would have complained about Louisiana on the jerseys, but nope.
why are there 10,000 views on a Mcneese thread?.. We need to move on.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)