… and to help understand the Cajuns' chances, it is probably instructive to go back to this post from March.
Brian
… and to help understand the Cajuns' chances, it is probably instructive to go back to this post from March.
Brian
Yes, but his point stands. The strength of your schedule has to weigh into it somewhat. If your schedule is well weaker than another team and your stats are better, it stands to reason that the other team's numbers went down due to tougher opposition. Stats dont factor into NCAA tournament selection
That's right. If the shoe were on the other foot, and we were playing more top RPI opponents, we'd argue that we need consideration of the opponents we're playing. I do, however, think that adjustments need to be made to not double and triple down on a few inter-related RPI formula components. There are components that over reward teams playing high RPI opponents and under reward teams for being dominant regardless of opponents' RPI.
But, I consider baseball post season (and regular) to be less effected by home field advantage than other major men's sports. And I think the regionals properly awards the right 1 seeds, keeps 2s and 3s in the hunt, and puts 4 seeds as "this is your reward for a good season or conference tournament... you may now go home". I like baseball and softball postseason for fairness, with the RPI factored in, better than anything out there in college athletics postseason.
Perfect Game's weekend preview has their early Top 8 projections. While I'm sure most of us wont agree with this necessarily (especially Cal Poly who we have beat in record, RPI, vs Top 25, 50 and 100), I certainly wouldn't be upset getting paired with a Houston or Texas should we emerge from the Regionals.
1. South Carolina
2. Florida St
3. Houston
4. Vandy
5. Texas
6. Virginia
7. Washington
8. Cal Poly
http://www.perfectgame.org/Articles/...x?article=9692
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)