Excuse me it is their right to invite who they wish and just because they made the wrong decision does not mean it is a man up situation. At the time we were debating the situation as it presented itself. Sure another win and they have no choice, but since you are attracting the discussion there is no man up involved, so why do you bring it to the table?
If on the other hand you are attacking the administration, I think that bridge has already been crossed. On the third hand if you are attacking the discussion of history then your blast has no value because it is well documented that outside influences affected all the issues raised.
jmo