We will not win just by changing out coaches... but rest easy... if we crap out this year... Bustle is history. HOWEVER... programs that have coaches that are "beneath" the program need to change out coaches. Right now, even with Bustle's lackluster record... our program deserves him. If he wakes up tomorrow, has a college football epiphany, and launches our program single-handedly above our contemporaries... he will be a miracle worker. This program needs to quit having a bunch of fans arguing over our "next coach" and stick to the root of the problem... funding.
What in the world makes people think we will search, select and secure someone better than Bustle? We had better make ourselves a more attractive program from within (full admin commitment) before we search for the next answer from available coaches. How many times have coaches come in as the "answer" only to leave as the "fault"?
We aren't going to do any better than Bustle is doing until we separate ourselves with funding. I'm sick of hearing people talk that we "should" beat the smiles off the Funroes and Mickyneeses on a regular basis when we have no meaningful net separators. The way to get a better program is not to just hammer on the admin to change out the coach. We will only get another coaching experiment. The way to do it right is to demand we institute a program that will not accept anything less out of a coach than a larger salary deserves.
It isn't as fun as beating up on the coach... but I am right about funding.