Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 48

Thread: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

  1. #13

    Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Scotto25 knows more than Brian about RPI. Fa sho


  2. #14

    Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Coaches Poll out, we are #13 -- tied with Louisville for the 13th spot actually, kinda weird.


  3. #15

    Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Quote Originally Posted by ragincajun10 View Post
    Coaches Poll out, we are #13 -- tied with Louisville for the 13th spot actually, kinda weird.
    Let's have an impromptu fight in a cornfield for the UL designation.

  4. #16

    Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Quote Originally Posted by cajunhawk View Post
    Let's have an impromptu fight in a cornfield for the UL designation.
    Battle of the "dash" vs. the "of".

  5. #17

    Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Quote Originally Posted by lifetimecajun View Post
    Scotto25 knows more than Brian about RPI. Fa sho
    HAHA!

  6. Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    RPI is almost predetermined as they will give every conference points for their name. Have you noticed how our conference has been doing head to head against other conferences. Our conference is way tougher than anyone in the money conferences will ever admit. Only in America can you be one of the last 4 teams standing and end up ranked 9th in the country. Rankings are prejudiced to say the least and absurd to say the most. Go Cajuns!!!


  7. Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Quote Originally Posted by scotto_25 View Post
    not useful to look at. Yale is #16.

  8. #20

    Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Quote Originally Posted by ImperialCajun View Post
    RPI is almost predetermined as they will give every conference points for their name. Have you noticed how our conference has been doing head to head against other conferences. Our conference is way tougher than anyone in the money conferences will ever admit. Only in America can you be one of the last 4 teams standing and end up ranked 9th in the country. Rankings are prejudiced to say the least and absurd to say the most. Go Cajuns!!!
    I think you are thinking about rankings being predetermined. RPI exists for this exact reason.

  9. Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Quote Originally Posted by ImperialCajun View Post
    RPI is almost predetermined as they will give every conference points for their name. Have you noticed how our conference has been doing head to head against other conferences. Our conference is way tougher than anyone in the money conferences will ever admit. Only in America can you be one of the last 4 teams standing and end up ranked 9th in the country. Rankings are prejudiced to say the least and absurd to say the most. Go Cajuns!!!
    that's why Yale is #16 and Dartmouth is #5 in rpi, although both 1-2 records. Its the IVY league being so overrated.

  10. #22

    Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Quote Originally Posted by MiamiCajun32 View Post
    that's why Yale is #16 and Dartmouth is #5 in rpi, although both 1-2 records. Its the IVY league being so overrated.
    Those two teams have played a combined 6 games. Which is why it is entirely too early to use RPI as a measuring stick.

  11. Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Quote Originally Posted by scotto_25 View Post
    I do not think anyone has these calculations down perfectly yet. Warren has one set of numbers, Boyd has another, and mine differ slightly from both of them. I did peek under the covers of Warren's data (not possible with Boyd) and I think he may be calculating SOS incorrectly ... in particular it may be OWP (but also possibly OOWP). I sent him a note to discuss ... will see if he responds.

    In any event, for those interested in the details as to how OWP is calculated for a given team ...

    - Take the Div. I W/L record for each of your opponents and remove the results of your games against that team.
    - Calculate the above winning percentage for each opponent to four decimals of precision.
    - Weight that winning percentage by the number of games played against each respective opponent.

    DO NOT sum the weighted W/L records of each of your opponents (non-Cajun games) and then calculate the percentage on that summed W/L record. This will yield a different result. This *seems* to be what Warren Nolan is doing.

    Example:
    Southern Mississippi is 6-6 overall. However, they are 6-3 in games not involving the Cajuns. Hence, for OWP purposes we use .6667 * 3 (weighted by three games played).

    - Then take all of the calculated weighted percentages and add them. Divide that sum by the total number of games played. You then have your OWP.

    Note: OWP calculations do not use the home/road weightings that WP calculations use.

    Example using Cajun opponents ...

    Eastern Illinois (2-10) ... 1-7 in non-Cajun games = .1250 * 4 (games) = .5000
    Northwestern State (6-4) ... 6-3 in non-Cajun games = .6667 * 1 (game) = .6667
    Southern Mississippi (6-6) ... 6-3 in non-Cajun games = .6667 * 3 (games) = 2.0000
    LSU (9-2) ... 9-1 in non-Cajun games = .9000 * 1 (game) = .9000
    Alabama (5-5) ... 4-3 in non-Cajun games = .5714 * 3 (games) = 1.7143
    --
    Total: 5.781/12 games = .4817 (note the above uses rounded figures to four decimal places)

    This is obviously different than the summed 49-50 record (.4949) ... and in some cases, the difference can be much more significant.

    Thus we have the following RPI calculation for UL ...

    WP = .7937
    OWP = .4817
    OOWP = .6137
    SOS = .5257
    --
    RPI = .5927

    On Warren's site, if you look at the SOS page, he calculates an opponents winning percentage of .4949 (49-50) by summing the weighted W/L record of each Cajun opponent and calculating the winning percentage. His SOS comes to .5249. His OOWP calculation is thus .5849.

    Brian

  12. #24

    Default Re: Baseball Rankings - 3/3

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin View Post
    I do not think anyone has these calculations down perfectly yet. Warren has one set of numbers, Boyd has another, and mine differ slightly from both of them. I did peek under the covers of Warren's data (not possible with Boyd) and I think he may be calculating SOS incorrectly ... in particular it may be OWP (but also possibly OOWP). I sent him a note to discuss ... will see if he responds.

    In any event, for those interested in the details as to how OWP is calculated for a given team ...

    - Take the Div. I W/L record for each of your opponents and remove the results of your games against that team.
    - Calculate the above winning percentage for each opponent to four decimals of precision.
    - Weight that winning percentage by the number of games played against each respective opponent.

    DO NOT sum the weighted W/L records of each of your opponents (non-Cajun games) and then calculate the percentage on that summed W/L record. This will yield a different result. This *seems* to be what Warren Nolan is doing.

    Example:
    Southern Mississippi is 6-6 overall. However, they are 6-3 in games not involving the Cajuns. Hence, for OWP purposes we use .6667 * 3 (weighted by three games played).

    - Then take all of the calculated weighted percentages and add them. Divide that sum by the total number of games played. You then have your OWP.

    Note: OWP calculations do not use the home/road weightings that WP calculations use.

    Example using Cajun opponents ...

    Eastern Illinois (2-10) ... 1-7 in non-Cajun games = .1250 * 4 (games) = .5000
    Northwestern State (6-4) ... 6-3 in non-Cajun games = .6667 * 1 (game) = .6667
    Southern Mississippi (6-6) ... 6-3 in non-Cajun games = .6667 * 3 (games) = 2.0000
    LSU (9-2) ... 9-1 in non-Cajun games = .9000 * 1 (game) = .9000
    Alabama (5-5) ... 4-3 in non-Cajun games = .5714 * 3 (games) = 1.7143
    --
    Total: 5.781/12 games = .4817 (note the above uses rounded figures to four decimal places)

    This is obviously different than the summed 49-50 record (.4949) ... and in some cases, the difference can be much more significant.

    Thus we have the following RPI calculation for UL ...

    WP = .7937
    OWP = .4817
    OOWP = .6137
    SOS = .5257
    --
    RPI = .5927

    On Warren's site, if you look at the SOS page, he calculates an opponents winning percentage of .4949 (49-50) by summing the weighted W/L record of each Cajun opponent and calculating the winning percentage. His SOS comes to .5249. His OOWP calculation is thus .5849.

    Brian
    Mind...Blown...

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Baseball Rankings - 4/21
    By wcd35 in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: April 22nd, 2014, 08:04 am
  2. Baseball Rankings - 4/7
    By wcd35 in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: April 8th, 2014, 09:35 am
  3. Baseball rankings
    By El Sidonio in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: April 16th, 2007, 03:14 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •