G2 WCWS UL-1 TxA&M-2

[Cajunsmike]

Damn, stupid error on a routine throw back to the pitcher costs us. Aggies get a run with two outs to take the lead.

I don't think the error hurt us as much as people are assuming. The runner had safely stole second. On the ensuing base hit, she would have been running on the swing with two out and would likely have scored from second. Of course we may have had a shot at her with a throw from center. It would have been a long shot however.

[Cajunsmike]

I thought it was a pop up out and she would have had to hold at 2nd.

I was under the impression she held at third till the ball was caught.

Winning run was scored on a base hit, not a sacrifice. That run was likely earned as scorers assume the runner will score from second on a base hit which leaves the infield.

[Mineshaft]

_ I don't think the error hurt us as much as people are assuming. The runner had safely stole second. On the ensuing base hit, she would have been running on the swing with two out and would likely have scored from second. Of course we may have had a shot at her with a throw from center. It would have been a long shot however. _

I agree and the throw from CF would of had to been perfect. The key was the steal of 2B not the error.

[Boomer]

Soto's line foul down the l-field line--Her almost and Gabby's almost HR-11111softball gods were against us---Then that scratch chopper over Brig's head up the middle to get the winning run on base----AAAAHHHHH--Do we see a diff pitcher manyana????? Oh big question Why are our ladies seperating their hands on the bat ---Saw one guy do that in the 50s for De La Salle

[racinbudds]

On the replay from the outfield, it looked as though Soto's foul crossed third in and then swung out. I was under the impression that all the ball has to do is be in fair territory before it crsses the plate, even in the air. That looked like a bad call. Besides they are only playing with three refs.

[Hammer58]

_ I don't think the error hurt us as much as people are assuming. The runner had safely stole second. On the ensuing base hit, she would have been running on the swing with two out and would likely have scored from second. Of course we may have had a shot at her with a throw from center. It would have been a long shot however. _

Thats the thing, at least we would have had a shot at a bang bang play at the plate. The error took away virtually any shot.

[BirdofParadise]

_ Thats the thing, at least we would have had a shot at a bang bang play at the plate. The error took away virtually any shot. _

1. That thing in front of the plate was fair. The call was correct on A&M's hit.

2. I don't think the error meant anything. We'd have had no shot to throw her out. She's already off the bag, running on contact and it took the ball awhile to get down. According to the box score the run was earned.

I agree with the previous post. Softball gods just werent with the Cajuns. Soto's ball in the sixth, if fair, we win.

A&m is really good. So are we.

[CajunRed]

Winning run was scored on a base hit, not a sacrifice. That run was likely earned as scorers assume the runner will score from second on a base hit which leaves the infield.

No... it hurt

[Pup]

Posted via http://igeaux.mobi
the error changes everything including them getting a hit at all

[Frenchie35]

A Question about the line up. This happen twice against Flordia. Bowers gets on base once by a hit and once by a walk. Than Brodhead bunts her over to second. Than we have two slap hitters come up. Hubbard slap hit and is thrown out at first for the second out. Bowers move up to third. Smith does the same thing, slap and is thrown out for the third out. With one out and a runner on second we need someone other than two slap hitters coming up. We have three slap hitters in a row. Number eight, nine and one in the batting order. Any thoughts on this?