The SEC has placed more than eight teams in the NCAA Tournament several times. Arkansas was not a surprise to me for several reasons. But first, you should consider that Arkansas was certainly not the last team in the field. The last team in the field was either UC Davis or Oklahoma. Arkansas is the #3 seed in the Palo Alto regional while UC Davis in the #4 seed in the same regional. UC Davis deserves to be in the field of 64. No way do I think that Oklahoma made the field of 64 before Arkansas.
Arkansas finished 9th in the SEC with a 14-15 record. But they were also only 1 1/2 games away from being the #4 seed in the SEC Tournament. The SEC was packed tight in the middle. Arkansas also had an RPI of 32.
I think that the last team in the field was either UC Davis or Oklahoma. The second to last team in the field was UC Davis or Oklahoma. Meanwhile the third to last team in the field was Arkansas. Arkansas also was a respectable 8-11 against the RPI Top 25. I think this made a huge difference. Meanwhile, Oklahoma was a paltry 9-17 in Big XII play (8th place). Yes, they went 2-1 in the Big XII Tournament. But still, that is 11-18 in conference play. The Sooners have an RPI of 41 and went 4-11-1 vs. the RPI Top 25. They did have a strong record vs. the RPI Top 75 (21-20-1). This, I believe coupled with the showing in the Big XII Tournament got them into the field.
Meanwhile, Oregon State (two-time defending national champion that proved themselves last season by barely making the field of 64 and then winning the national championship ... again) finished 11-13 in a tightly packed Pac-10 (as with the SEC). The Beavers finished in a three-way tie for 6th, but were only two games removed from third place UCLA and three games removed from second place and regional host Stanford. The Beavers finished a single game behind #1 seed Arizona. As far as Oregon State's resume is concerned, they have an RPI of 59 (this hurt them), but they also were 8-10 vs. the RPI Top 25 and 13-15 vs. the RPI Top 50. They did have some bad losses on their resume. But I certainly thought that their conference record (second best baseball conference in the country this season) along with their record vs. top teams would get them into the field over Oklahoma. Oregon State split against national seed Arizona State (four games) and took a three game series against national seed Georgia. They also took 2/3 from #1 seed Arizona and #2 seed Pepperdine. I feel a bit cheated in that I would have liked to see the Beavers defend their back-to-back national championships with a plethora of impressive pitching coming back from last season.
I do not buy the argument that a team must qualify for their postseason conference tournament if they are to qualify for the NCAA Tournament. Absolutes such as this do not make sense when you consider how tightly packed some of the elite conferences are from season to season. While the SEC has not had the elite teams at the top for a while now. Top to bottom, there has not been a stronger conference in the country. A team should not be penalized because they finished 1/2 game behind *two* schools that qualified for the SEC Tournament. Especially when they were short a game (rainout) and the two teams that finished 1/2 game ahead of them (South Carolina and Mississippi) lost 5/6 to the team in question (Arkansas). If Arkansas wins that rainout, they are the #7 seed in the SEC Tournament.
What matters is your resume from top to bottom.
Brian