I have heard this argument many times before and everytime I do it sounds rediculously to me.
Was UL not "traditionally a poor football school" when Hud took the job? He took a job at a University where we have NEVER had a coach leave and be a Division I head coach again. EVER!!!
Competitors like Hud don't look at other people's failures in the past and think, "Well if those guys couldn't win there I sure can't."
Dude is full of confidence and believes that whatever University he chooses to coach at he can make a winner. His history has proven that he is correct so far.