Page 15 of 17 FirstFirst ... 5 12 13 14 15 16 17 LastLast
Results 169 to 180 of 200

Thread: Recruits

  1. #169

    Default Re: Recruits

    Quote Originally Posted by raginsaints View Post
    LOL at that one dude talking crap about Lafayette women
    This right here!

    I've done way too much time in Lubbock back in the old days.

  2. #170

    Default Re: Recruits

    I've always heard that if you're looking for herpes, Lubbock is where you want to be


  3. Default Re: Recruits

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    If stars mattered, they wouldn't change depending on the school he is signing/committed to. He is either a 4 star or he isn't. So why when a kid is being recruited by upper level sec he is a 4, then if he commits elsewhere he is all of a sudden a 3? Nothing changed about the kid...just where he wants to go to school.
    -------------------Well as a true star gazer, I figured this out a long time ago-----It is call a flaw in the 'STAW" ---little ebonic help there!!!! lol

  4. #172

    Default Re: Recruits

    Quote Originally Posted by raginsaints View Post
    I've always heard that if you're looking for herpes, Lubbock is where you want to be
    Saints, thats one of the best things about Lubbock.

  5. #173

    Default Re: Recruits

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunFan3406 View Post
    D-line despite the conflicting details on Scout.

    My apologies if my comment came off the wrong way. Just wanted to make it known to those who were asking a few days back about any unknown targets that the staff was looking at. Kidd was one of the ones that they were really hoping to flip.
    No big deal guys, this is public info. Here's how it works, most athletes get bio's or profiles build their junior or sophomore years on Rivals, Scout or 247. It's usually done by publishers or recruiting analysis that cover a specific program or conference. So if an athlete plays both sides of the football it usually comes down to what position he is being recruited at or works out at when visiting football camps. So Ken Edwards and LaDarrius Kidd are listed as offensive linemen because they have played there and worked out at those positions for SEC programs. Both will play on the defensive line at UL. CJ Bates was an all-state safety at Louisiville HS his senior year, so he wants to return to the defensive side of the football. That is the primary position he will get a look at this spring. Malik Williams would be listed as an athlete, but Scout.com does not have that category to assign, so his primary position is listed at WR. He will get s shot on both sides of the football at UL.

  6. #174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    No big deal guys, this is public info. Here's how it works, most athletes get bio's or profiles build their junior or sophomore years on Rivals, Scout or 247. It's usually done by publishers or recruiting analysis that cover a specific program or conference. So if an athlete plays both sides of the football it usually comes down to what position he is being recruited at or works out at when visiting football camps. So Ken Edwards and LaDarrius Kidd are listed as offensive linemen because they have played there and worked out at those positions for SEC programs. Both will play on the defensive line at UL. CJ Bates was an all-state safety at Louisiville HS his senior year, so he wants to return to the defensive side of the football. That is the primary position he will get a look at this spring. Malik Williams would be listed as an athlete, but Scout.com does not have that category to assign, so his primary position is listed at WR. He will get s shot on both sides of the football at UL.
    With Edwards and Kidd, will they play defense because they are better suited here for that? Is it because that's where they rather play? Did that play a role in committing here? I hear it a lot at the larger programs and I'm sure it happens everywhere but I don't understand why a coaching staff would try to force a kid to play a position or a side of the ball that he doesn't want to play.

  7. #175

    Default Re: Recruits

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    With Edwards and Kidd, will they play defense because they are better suited here for that? Is it because that's where they rather play? Did that play a role in committing here? I hear it a lot at the larger programs and I'm sure it happens everywhere but I don't understand why a coaching staff would try to force a kid to play a position or a side of the ball that he doesn't want to play.
    With Edwards and Kidd, they will play there because its hard for lower level programs to sign big athletes that run that well. If you are LSU, Auburn or Alabama....you sign a dozen like them on both sides of the football. Good DL are a premium at any level, but especially at mid-majors. Kidd ran a 5.0 forty at 310 pounds in camp last summer.

  8. #176

    Default Re: Recruits

    CajunT, Malik Williams, I am told by J-Town, that All opposing coaches, would say after playing Jennings, that Williams can play anywhere in the country, and he was the best talent/athlete on the field night after night. What say you?


  9. #177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by scotto_25 View Post
    Here's what Texas Tech thinks about their "once" prized recruit getting stolen

    http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=188&f=1650&t=12654306
    What an interesting thread. Some immense stupidity from 2 or 3 posters, and then the rest seem very level-headed.

    Their better posters do think that Kidd has the ability to become a good player and they were disappointed in losing him. Looks like he was their only d-line commitment out of HS. Rest that they have committed were JC guys.

  10. #178

    Default Re: Recruits

    Quote Originally Posted by DaddyCajun View Post
    CajunT, Malik Williams, I am told by J-Town, that All opposing coaches, would say after playing Jennings, that Williams can play anywhere in the country, and he was the best talent/athlete on the field night after night. What say you?
    Mailik Williams could be the McGuire of the 2014 Class!

  11. #179

    Default Re: Recruits

    Quote Originally Posted by UL_BayouCajun View Post
    Stars are there for a reason. They were good enough to get noticed to receive stars. Granted there are some that slip through and do not get stars. or don't get graded appropriately and get less stars than they deserve.

    But we all know that if we had more stars to look at than what we have, everyone would be praising it. since we don't have as much stars as we would like, everyone is discrediting the stars.

    With all that said, I trust the UL coaching staff. 3 ....9-4 seasons in a row is enough proof for me!!!
    Kidd pulled an offer from Oklahoma the week after he committed to Texas Tech. So he now has 2 legitimate Big12 offers along with UL, UAB and Louisiana Tech. Big linemen that can move as well as he can are not 2 Star atheltes.

  12. #180

    Default Re: Recruits

    Kidd is listed as a 2 star on CajunRedZone, what was he listed when committed to Texas Tech?


Page 15 of 17 FirstFirst ... 5 12 13 14 15 16 17 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Top 100 LA Recruits
    By VObserver in forum PlayerDock
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: December 24th, 2018, 06:50 pm
  2. How are UL's recruits doing
    By CAJUN_LXA685 in forum PlayerDock
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: September 19th, 2011, 10:55 pm
  3. Top recruits
    By CrappDaddy in forum PlayerDock
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: February 4th, 2011, 08:44 pm
  4. Recruits?
    By Clutch0364 in forum Football
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: November 14th, 2004, 08:10 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •