http://mcneesesports.cstv.com/view.gal?id=27248 Something doesn't look right with the fonts on the numbers on our field..they aren't "italic" if you get my drift. I guess I'm just speculating prematurely.. I have that problem
I will be going tonight and ask that question. They do have a brand new machine with a brush on it. It might be for that purpose. But I do know that the wrinkles/lumps will be taken out. Howand when that's the question. They will have to take them out before the put they numbers and hash mark on because if they pull from the edge to get the wrinkles out it will cause the lines and number to be misaligned....you can be sure this is all thought out.
Thanks for the pics. For the record, I wanted the whole thing to be red, not just endzones. Of course, maybe its not good to be famous for your turf.
I really dislike the Boise state colored field. I, also, dislike the NCAA. What gives them the right to determine what color athletic field a school may have. Sooner or later they will be the final authority on how an athletic facility is to look. They put pressure on the CWS folks in Omaha to build another facility so that their coffers, and those of the BCS, can continue to overflow.
Wouldn't a green artificial turf also fall under the category of colored? Perhaps we should put down a white turf just to mess with the NCAA big wigs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)