This is exactly how I feel.
When Authement changed to UL-Lafayette he was taking a gamble that we'd be able to get away with using UL and Louisiana. Well, it didn't work out that way. Every time we've pushed ahead on one front we were met with just as much pushback. Here we are 13 years later and we've made no progress from where we were in 2000. In fact, back then we could use Louisiana and UL even more liberally than we can today. And outside of Acadiana next to no one calls us UL. At this point anyone who thinks this can still be won, and by win I mean total victory where everyone calls us UL athletically and academically, isn't thinking straight.
Acadiana University sounds much better than Louisiana-Lafayette. It gets rid if the double-directional plague and cuts ties with ULM. We'll never be able to create a strong identity with our current name. You can't keep doing the same thing over and over and expect different results.
He just said that the AD had nothing to do with the decsion. I believe he is laying responsibility towards the President.
Someone just asked Jay if it was athletics or the administration that signed off--he said that the athletic director DOESN'T make those decisions!! So.....
I wonder if the backlash is going to force someone out of hiding to discuss the issue. I'm not holding my breath though.
They have to know that they are hurting the University by essentially branding us as the school with the identity issue. People are laughing at us. They also have to at least have an idea that this is an absolute slap in the face to alumni, doners, fans, and everyone that they rallied to get on board the "Louisiana" train.
I completely agree with Jay on this. Farmer does not say how to handle branding.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)