Like many others, you can't read and actually take time to understand the meaning of what someone is saying. I don't think its being a bad fan if you criticize something you saw in a game, even if you won. I have had nothing but positive things to say about Hud in his time here and feel he has been a great asset to our program. If you can't see that in my postings, you can move along skippy
I love HUD! I am glad he speaks from the heart. However, what kind of questions would he get after that game? It is a post game news conference. The media luncheon is for analyzing the whole season. I understand the frustration and I think that shows that he is genuine. I really like his explanation too. A coach can't listen to negativity though. If he thinks it's negative here, can you imagine an SEC school? To his defense, this is probably the first time that he has really felt any pressure since he has been here. He was at North Alabama as a head coach before and it is a big time Division 2 program. He was very successful there too. So I'm not sure he is experienced with pressure. It is something he will get good at. One week away til I am in NOLA. Getting pumped
The Cajuns are to Arkansas St. what S. Alabama is to the Cajuns. Just had a bad day againest a good team. It happens.
Bigbuf, that's not cool toward Zephyr. I'm another that uses this forum to both praise and criticize. Hud was firing off because he was frustrated, just like we fire off in frustration. You can't say, "I only want the fans that pump sunshine up my butt 24/7" and expect a great fan base. Hud just blew off some steam. No big deal. He was irritated. Someone smarter than him will coach him back up and tell him that's not the way to deal with a bad game.
I love this team and I admire the heck out of Hud and his staff. This forum has not been negative about the players. We rave on here about the players. We have criticized the coaching at times. But this is the best he's ever going to get it.
I took this article to imply Hud understands the passion in this fan base and apologizes for banging on "even the critical" fans. He's a young coach by most standards. He's learning as he goes. But I absolutely guarantee you that he does not want to run off the critical football fan. No way.
Last edited by TCbacker54; December 12th, 2013 at 10:18 am. Reason: Had a typo that looked like I received my education in Moanroe.
I'll be honest, I thought USA was better than ASU, at least late in the year. They were playing really well. Their QB was second team all SBC and their defense is the best in the league. A loss to ULM was toughly contested game where crucial turnovers late spelled our doom. I can live with that. It happens from time to time, especially against rivals for which you've owned the past 5 or 6 years. I could really handle a tough, hard fought loss to USA had it been a contested ball game that maybe just got decided by the bounce of a ball here or there but we were never in it. However, if Bigbuf is not embarrassed by what he saw last weekend, then maybe his fandom needs to be questioned. Oh, I'm sorry. We aren't supposed to be embarrassed right?
Z, do you think we may have peaked as a team too early in the year or are we just one dimensional in that we rely on Broadway more than we should have to? I understand QB is an integral part of the team, but it seems as though it is the only part of the team in regards to our play the last couple of weeks.
I do think we peaked at mid season but I don't think we used Broadway enough. This offense, even dating back to Gautier running it, was at its best when the QB is a true threat to run the ball and pass. Broadway's numbers in both passing and rushing were down this year, even had he played the whole game against ULM and USA. While the running backs are studs, I think our offense is best when the ball is in the QB's hands, at least Broadway's hands. After the ASU game last year where he struggled, this offense simply hummed once we got going and Broadway was leading the conference in total offense. I think we kind of sold our passing game short this year and our receivers talents. However, the running game was able to chew up more clock and if you look at this year's total defensive numbers compared to last year, they are actually better in many categories which shows what a good running game can do
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)