Rethinking the New Orleans Bowl

[RCAJUN90]

I think it is real simple. If we have a chance to play a ranked team we go there. If it is a chance to play a BCS school we should go there. I would think beating the snot out of Tulane on the field and in the stands would be awesome. Anyone other than Tulane in the NOLA bowl, we should go elsewhere. Unless of course that is the only option. Let's NOT PULL A TECH AND SIT HOME!

[Cajunrunner]

I don't like the article or the Independent either but no reason to slam an entire family name on a public forum. Show some class man.

I am good friends with a lot of this family and they do not all share the views of this writer.

I have expressed to my buddy how rediculous it is that his uncle's paper doesn't support the local University. He agrees that its BS.

Guess I should have narrowed my classification down to Steve and Cheryl May, whom I don't mind naming, because they've allowed their rag to say worse about other people who didn't deserve it.

I apologize to your buddy for not being specific.

[TravlnCajun]

I didn't think I could read an article so filled with disdain & lacking in facts than some of the recent "name rants " from up north. This writer proves that Arrogance & stupidity are truly dangerous when combined in this fashion.

[CajunEXPRESS]

If a ACC team does not want to play a SBC team then we need to provide them with one that will knock the snot out of a ACC team.

As long as we have a small school mentality we will always remain a small school we need to reach for the stars and tell teams that we will play you any where any time.

We will never get respect if we never play or beat a team from an AQ conference

Last time I checked UL can only accept an invitation. UL has zero power here. The SBC could grow a pair and enforce the Indy Bowl contract. Must be a letter of understanding instead of a contract.

[Hammer58]

Last time I checked UL can only accept an invitation. UL has zero power here. The SBC could grow a pair and enforce the Indy Bowl contract. Must be a letter of understanding instead of a contract.

Yea, I thought Karl stated a contract was an iron clad document that couldn't be renegotiated or broken?