For all the talk about how Authement will hand over the reins of UL to his successor debt free (which is a good thing for the most part), perhaps being in a little bit of debt would have saved the university millions in the long run.
I started at UL in the spring of '03. In the fall of '02 semester, the student body voted to build UL's Intramural facitlity, Bourgeois Hall, a new state of the art weight room. That was five years ago and they have yet to break ground. The bids went out and the quote was 2.1 million. The cost was going to be funded through student assessed fees. According to Authement's policy, the money would be collected and stored in an account until enough money was in there to cover the entire cost of the project. Sounds good right?
Problem number 1
This means that the students who voted on the bill will never be able to use the facility. In fact, the students who passed the proposition are now long gone, and the university still hasn't broke ground on the project.
Problem number 2
The cost of supplies saw a slight, but natural increase during the first two years of saving. To compensate, the plans for the weightroom were changed from two full floors, to one and a half.
Problem number 3
In the summer of 2007 I was told by the Director of Intramurals that they had finally saved up all 2.1 million needed to cover costs of the project. It looked like the weight room would finally be a reality. A few weeks later, the director recieved a devestating letter from Authement. The letter stated that due to the hurricanes, prices of building materials had skyrocketed. Thus the new estimated cost for the project was now 5.4 million dollars. A more than 100% increase.
Conclusion
Had Authement taken out a loan for the project in the beginning, the project could have been built as a full two story, state of the art weightroom, for 2.1 million plus interest - let's say 500,000. Now, not only was the project only going to be 1 and a half stories (an extended balcony not a full 2nd floor), but it was going to cost 2.3 million dollars more to build.
The university is debt free, but at what cost? The university would have paid more in interest in the short run, but would have saved millions of dollars in the long run had we just taken on a little bit of debt. Not only would they have saved all that money, but the original students who voted on the project would have actually gotten to use it and the debt would have been payed off by next month. Now we'll be waiting another 3-5 years for this project. Students have become apathetic. Why vote on anything new, when they'll probably never see it much less get to use it? Debt free doesn't always equal financial responsibility.