Can they just quit being a school all together while they're at it?
Can they just quit being a school all together while they're at it?
Here's my response: "Hey Jimmy, geaux for it, dude, and don't let the door smack you in the @$$ on the way out!! WE ARE LOUISIANA!! GEAUX CAJUNS!!!!"
Pfff they have no weight behind their decision. If they want to change their name then do it...Fu:ck 'em! They are a worthless sack of s. H. I. T university that had to ride the coat tails of this university with the name change. If we didnt have them bothering us and the SBC about petty bull crap then we would both be better off...... Please change back to northeastern university and watch how fast you drop to I-AA and become the little _____ for mcneese/SLU in the southland...... Then we can be LOUISIANA, with no little turd complaining to the north
Bill Decker...the gift that keeps on giving.
Never heard of him until he got his boss fired last week.
STOP
IT!!!! We play a huge game in 3 days and we are trying to get SOME PUBLICITY OUT!!! Get some people to come to the game Thursday!!!
I really try to refrain from reading and posting a whole lot on the name thing because, quite frankly, it will drive me nuts and it would likely turn my daily life into one negative blur. However, I am confused as to what he said about this "equal partnership" between the two schools. I never took this law that was hastily written to be any type of partnership between the schools but rather a forced hand marriage. Am I remembering this scenario wrongly?
i suppose this belongs here:
http://www.ulmhawkeyeonline.com/?p=13528
circular logic. let's end this debate by continuing this debate so that it can end...after we talk about it some more.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)