Only to fans, not to university presidents. A u. p. will not leave a conference that pays his school $1M in post season revenue for one that pays $500K. The natural progression is "follow the dollars." Right now, the dollars flow from the Sun Belt to Conference USA to the next one in line. One year from now, when the dollars flow in a different direction, the attention will also change direction. Perception is important. It's simply not the main criteria university presidents use to make their decisions.
Perception does matter to university presidents. In just about every one of these moves the university officials have cited a desire to be associated with certain schools, schools they consider peers both athletically and academically. I don't think T-Joe sees Moanroe, the GSU twins and Application State are our peers that we want to be associated with.
This damned small time thinking was so symptomatic of the Authement regime. What's got you so enamored with the Belt? Karl promise to invite Liberty? Or maybe operating the shot clock at the basketball tourney? Or is this the pillow talk you are hearing in the AD's office to justify sitting idly on our asses when the next CUSA opportunity rolls around? If so that is all the more reason for a change in our athletic admin.
ASU-ASU
GSU-GSU
UL-UL
The SBC better flee (and flee fast) from becoming known as the DCC
Duplicate Content Conference.
ULM and Louisiana is the best, shortest, quickest path away from DCC.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)