No snote i dont push pro grass or any other grass for that matter. lol I have seen the turf at STM since the first game that it was put down. Although it looks great, it does appear to be a surface that can be slippery when wet. So i hope that we go with a different type of surface
grins pman.. aren't we all "slippery when wet" (tee-hee)
not here to knock anyone's turf for sure but have heard and seen many slips off of ambassador caffery..
when ever one hears the term "sand based" turf used.... that is a hint to what product they are looking at.
ps. all products have plenty of sand in them
The turf will be sand filled, unlike STM, and is a "2 generation" upgrade from the turf in the training facility.
As of the Friday, last week, the contract had not yet been signed, but it is a done deal and the contract could be signed "any minute".
I spoke with one of the coaches the other day and we will be using a sand infill and not the rubber infill. This will look much better and will be cooler in the heat.
the field we are putting down is meant to become less slippery when rained on and will not get as hot in the sun as the turf with rubber pellets.
I think that is wrong. I think STM has the same turf as Ark. St. and what McNeese is installing. It is GSE Geosport Geomax turf. The infill material is not black rubber. Check the project list on their website and the project pictures.
http://www.gsegeosport.com/
Pro-Green is from a totally different company. And uses the black rubber infill material.
http://www.progreen.com/
Doc
Okay, if it is Pro-Green why does Geosports claim it, have it listed in their projects section, and have a picture of it on their project photo area.
See link of project photos below:
http://www.gsegeosport.com/geomax_project_photos.shtml
And here is a partial project list:
Project List
Project Name Location Square Footage Installed
Texarkana High School Texarkana, AR 95,000
Bishop Hendricken High School Warwick, RI 98,000
Speed Strength Systems Euclid, OH Training Surfaces
Arkansas State University Jonesboro, AR 94,000
St. Thomas More High School Lafayette, LA 96,000
Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 10,500
Greenwich High School Greenwich, CT 80,000
West Monroe High School West Monroe, LA 82,000
Cayman International School Cayman Islands 76,000
New York Central Park New York, NY 15,000
Auburn Sports Complex Auburn, MA 40,000
French American School Portland, OR 10,000
Soccer Blast Burnsville, MN 40,000
Capital Area Soccer League (CASL) Raleigh, NC 220,000
Actin Indoor Sports Actin, MA 50,000
CT Sportsplex North Branford, CT 15,000
Prospects Sports Academy Jackson, MO 10,000
Devine Independent School District Devine, Tx 8,000
*For a complete list of GSE GeoMax Replicated Grass™ artificial turf project list, please contact a GSE representative
for more information.
Answer me that one? Someone has it wrong. I tend to believe Geosport.
Doc
Yeah I'm an idiot; Not the first nor the last time I stand corrected. For some reason I just remember Pro-Green.
What I learned about rubber pellets versus sand is on a hot day, the rubber gets hot and the field temperature also rises causeing the players to get the brunt of it. I learned this from a young high school soccer player that plays soccer on the Independence Stadium's field and he HATES playing on the rubber filled turf. He told me it somewhat unbearable at times.
I think rubber is recommended for inside and sand for outside, just what I heard from higher ups
Geaux Cajuns
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)