Jay's article needs to be placed in all of the publications interested in the reality of the situation. Jay doesn't have a problem with his media colleagues, but I do. They intentionally either obliterated the facts, or they are so incompetent at writing anything truthful... or even interesting for that matter... that they should be, at the very least, chastised for it.
I expect nonsense to come out of fan forums... and that includes ours. But to have these so-called professionals and their editors pump out these quarter baked piles of nonsense is beyond acceptable. The only thing that a state legislature ought to get involved in is questioning what our universities have created in modern day Jounalism and Broadcast and Communications.
I'm an engineer by degree and I can think and write exponentially better than these twerps. I'm so unimpressed with these people it disgusts me. These are what young people that go to college aspire to be?
In my profession, if I were to write a technical article for publication... I'd at least get the fundamental 5 base facts straight. These pathetic writers (and their editors) don't care one bit about accuracy. All they seem to care about is stirring the pot like a drive-by mudslinger on a fan forum.
If this continues... I can assure you some people with some stroke are going to put these people in a world of hurt. There are a few remaining people in this world that are smart and powerful enough to cut a dead branch off of the tree before the whole tree dies. I can assure you of that. If you do not want to be that dead branch, you had better do your job better.
In today's media run by mostly unprofessional and undedicated to their craft types, the only thing that matters is the headline being controversial and generating "clicks". Headline can be completely opposite of the points in the actual article, that's just fine in today's media. Just make sure the headline gets a lot of hits, makes people want to know wtf is this about!?!?
In the past, in the era of the original change, lsu was very vocal against UL. The latest lsu statement, does not show interference or opposition. It may change, and it probably will, but at the moment, I don't see lsu taking a negative position. This to me is significant, and is very important. As long as they stay out of what UL wants to be named athletically, then I don't see enough political opposition to bring about any additional changes to what the University is doing. In fact, it could have the opposite effect and solidify UL's position. Hopefully, they stay out of it.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)