every sister school in our system expects political help and support from us and we give that.....time to call in the chips.....
every sister school in our system expects political help and support from us and we give that.....time to call in the chips.....
Do those other states have laws like Louisiana has?
Probably not. But I have never seen a school like LAMOANROE risk their brand to hurt another schools brand. They have wins over Bama and Arkansas, yet they are still losing money and hurting, and decide to attack the Cajuns rather than taking control of their own destiny.
ULM's 'Louisiana' initiative failed the first time because UL was already branded as "Louisiana's" now the apostrophe s was unnecessary and was dropped.
Side note, it may have been because of Jerry Tark but I always had a higher perception of UNLV over Nevada.
In the end it takes an accurate name and more importantly winning.
There has always been at attitude in this state of "if I can't get ahead I will try to keep you down". This is seen as a play for "Flagship" status by others inside of our system.....I believe that no one will ever be declared the flagship University inside of this system one reason being LSU will fight tooth and nail to keep the word "flagship" away from any other University in the State.... Using the acronym "Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns" is completely legal as was the term "Louisiana's Ragin' Cajuns"...all that we have done is make the acronym cleaner by dropping the 's. We are doing with our athletic branding exactly what Nevada-Reno did....
You see, THIS is what the HOAX fans don't get. If they want espn-Bristol to force the city designation on us, then it WILL be forced on them too. Thus, thwarting their own branding effort as ULM. They don't want the City designation any more than us, but they'll tolerate it to keep us from branding as Louisiana.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)