NFL survivor

[CharlieK]

So Buccaneers > Seahawks. Got it.

[cajunhawk]

So Buccaneers > Seahawks. Got it.

Cowboys>Saints. Got it. Your logic chief.

[cajuncorkdork]

Cowboys>Saints. Got it. Your logic chief.

Got it. Cowboys>Saints if youre 50+ years old .......

[CharlieK]

Cowboys>Saints. Got it. Your logic chief.

Sure no problem. Still both > than the Seahawks. Chief.

[UL_Cajuns]

I guess if I've got to get kicked out theres no better way than having the Falcons lose in embarrassing fashion ...... I can live with that. Good luck Negrodamus and UL_Cajuns the rest of the way

Thanks. I can't believe I am still in it.

[Turbine]

Oh how proud you must be....the Saints might finally reach double digits in playoff appearances. And it only took close to half a century. That one season changes all that though. All those rough seasons with grocery bags on your heads. Proud franchise.

Including a 12-3 season

[cajunhawk]

Sure no problem. Still both > than the Seahawks. Chief.

The typical Saints fan...too proud to know his own history...too ignorant to have an argument with...and too stupid to know the difference.

[cajunhawk]

Including a 12-3 season

Seahawks had one of those too Turbine. They just didn't have the refs behind them or Mr Charlie wouldn't have much else to say. Still both Franchises have only been to one Super Bowl. That's tied with the Arizona Cardinals.

[cajunhawk]

Got it. Cowboys>Saints if youre 50+ years old .......

Or if you were a fan before 2009...

[CharlieK]

The typical Saints fan...too proud to know his own history...too ignorant to have an argument with...and too stupid to know the difference.

Being called stupid by cajunhawk. It's like a right of passage. When his arguments break down he resorts to insults. It's like you and BWK are brothers.

Anybody who doesn't admit that historically the cowboys have been better than the saints is delusional. That historical success has sustained them through 15-20 years of sucking. None of that is relavent to the fact the saints have a superbowl and the hawks do not. No amount of bluster will change that. I pull for the Cajuns cause I went to school there. I pull for the saints cause I'm from Louisiana. I'm not a Walmart tiger fan or a fan of some random NFL team.

[cajunhawk]

Being called stupid by cajunhawk. It's like a right of passage. When his arguments break down he resorts to insults. It's like you and BWK are brothers.

Mine are a bit more subtle. You cannot argue the end all of NFL Franchises as Super Bowls. It's the ultimate prize but only one team can win it at a time and the best team isn't always the winner of it. It's just who got on a hot streak at the right time and who was in a position to succeed at the right time. Case in point...ELI MANNING HAS MORE SUPER BOWL RINGS THAN DAN MARINO. They also play 16 games in a season. Those...kind of...count...a bit. You cannot forget how awful a franchise has done over it's tenure because you onside kicked your way into a Super Bowl ring...I'm sorry...life doesn't work that way. To me...that way of thinking is ignorant...and stupid. Sorry to hurt your wittle feelings but son...that is a dumb way to go through life. You are like the guy who ____ed the prom queen in 86...and you keep bringing it up. No one cares what happened that one time.

Anybody who doesn't admit that historically the cowboys have been better than the saints is delusional. That historical success has sustained them through 15-20 years of sucking. None of that is relavent to the fact the saints have a superbowl and the hawks do not. No amount of bluster will change that. I pull for the Cajuns cause I went to school there. I pull for the saints cause I'm from Louisiana. I'm not a Walmart tiger fan or a fan of some random NFL team.

So let's deal in absolutes here. The Saints have one Super Bowl win and one Super Bowl appearance. That's a fact. The Seahawks have zero Super Bowl wins and one Super Bowl appearance and one massive ____ job from the NFL and the refs. With that said...the Saints all time have a worse winning percentage over a longer period of time than the Seahawks do. No amount of pointing to that one Super Bowl win will change that fact. The Saints also have less playoff appearances than the Seahawks do over a longer period of time. No amount of pointing to that one Super Bowl win will change that fact. The Saints also have never won a road playoff game in the near half century they have been in existence. No amount of pointing to that one Super Bowl win will change that fact.

You are right...The Saints have won a Super Bowl and the Seahawks have not. I still do not see the need to start a ____ing contest over this. Look back at my original post in this thread. I wasn't even picking a fight. You came here with your panties in a bunch ready to come at me with your stone cold truth. Fine...bring that truth boy. But don't get mad when I call you ignorant and stupid for beating the same ____ing drum over and over again. You earned that ____ing title by being a simpleton. You wonder why I hate the Saints. It's dick heads like you that make the Saints fan base seem like drunken swamp crawlers. Sadly...it's a badge most of you mouth breathers wear like a badge of honor. Go Seahawks...____ the Saints.

[CharlieK]

Mine are a bit more subtle. You cannot argue the end all of NFL Franchises as Super Bowls. It's the ultimate prize but only one team can win it at a time and the best team isn't always the winner of it. It's just who got on a hot streak at the right time and who was in a position to succeed at the right time. Case in point...ELI MANNING HAS MORE SUPER BOWL RINGS THAN DAN MARINO. They also play 16 games in a season. Those...kind of...count...a bit. You cannot forget how awful a franchise has done over it's tenure because you onside kicked your way into a Super Bowl ring...I'm sorry...life doesn't work that way. To me...that way of thinking is ignorant...and stupid. Sorry to hurt your wittle feelings but son...that is a dumb way to go through life. You are like the guy who ____ed the prom queen in 86...and you keep bringing it up. No one cares what happened that one time.



So let's deal in absolutes here. The Saints have one Super Bowl win and one Super Bowl appearance. That's a fact. The Seahawks have zero Super Bowl wins and one Super Bowl appearance and one massive ____ job from the NFL and the refs. With that said...the Saints all time have a worse winning percentage over a longer period of time than the Seahawks do. No amount of pointing to that one Super Bowl win will change that fact. The Saints also have less playoff appearances than the Seahawks do over a longer period of time. No amount of pointing to that one Super Bowl win will change that fact. The Saints also have never won a road playoff game in the near half century they have been in existence. No amount of pointing to that one Super Bowl win will change that fact.

You are right...The Saints have won a Super Bowl and the Seahawks have not. I still do not see the need to start a ____ing contest over this. Look back at my original post in this thread. I wasn't even picking a fight. You came here with your panties in a bunch ready to come at me with your stone cold truth. Fine...bring that truth boy. But don't get mad when I call you ignorant and stupid for beating the same ____ing drum over and over again. You earned that ____ing title by being a simpleton. You wonder why I hate the Saints. It's dick heads like you that make the Saints fan base seem like drunken swamp crawlers. Sadly...it's a badge most of you mouth breathers wear like a badge of honor. Go Seahawks...____ the Saints.

Wow you just wrote 1000 words....who's panties are in a knot?

The simple fact is the saints have been Super Bowl champs, while the hawks have not. Sorry that bothers you so much. I'm not mad, not in the least. I'm laughing at you. Just like everybody else.

You actually just called someone you don't know a dick head. Because they talked a little NFL smack. Seriously. Are you 12?