Excellent Post CajunShocker!!!!!!!!
Excellent Post CajunShocker!!!!!!!!
I do agree with you that some have turned out to be good players, but just as many have turned out to be busts. Just because a player originally committed to a bigger school and then de-commited does not make him a great player. I wouldn't however put much stock in someone who turned down Toledo, Marshall, or FIU. Same goes for a 5 star rated, blue chip prospect. They can turn out to be a donkey, too.
I have been impressed with the play of some of the guys you metioned above, though.
I am not concerned so much with where they wanted to go or how many stars some websited gives them. I am concerned with our coaching staffs ability to recognize and recruit talent. Like I said before, we are currently 1-7 and that speaks louder than anyones opinion on how talented our players are.
I do see that we are young, and perhaps another year for Bustle will show that he has recruited well and has built something solid, but I have to say that I am losing faith. I will support them till the day I die, but I don't think Bustle is the guy.
This statement says a lot. I think that its easy to see that we've been able to recruit talent. A #7 ranked rushing offense will prove that. But its easy for all of us to see that Defense is often the straw that breaks the back. I don't know what the problem is...maybe he concentrated too much on offense before. Maybe he took as many chances on O players as D players, and it just worked otu better on the offensive side. Maybe the guys donig the defensive recruiting weren't that great of talent assessors. Who really knows. I do know that I hear a lot of folks harp on this youth thing and that they keep repeating that our youth is very athletic, and that it'll pay off. but, I agree with Shocker, I don't know that bustle is the guy to show us that. And like I've said before, if we do give him the chance to have another year, then is it worth the consequences if it doesn't work out?
Plus, if we axe a white guy with two years left on his deal after a 1 or two win season, then we'll surely never have to pay jerry Baldwin anything.
CajunShocker:
Rivals can't evaluate you if you don't sign up with them. Not every high school recruit signs up with Rivals. Rivals is in this to make money. If you are good enough to play at that next level, you will be found, you do your homework and you advertise youself. Thinking that just because you signed up on Rivals and they evaluated you is going to get you a scholarship is ridiculous. This is the exact reason we have started a website to help players, parents and fans understand the recruiting process.
I wish I could speed the clock up to the spring game next year. For all the non-believers, you're going to miss out if you jump ship now.
None of us are jumping ship...i will always support the players. My feelings are that this team has the talent to win right now and we aren't so whose fault is that...the Head Coach!!! I do not think Bustle needs to be given more time to prove anything, what if he is given another year and he wins 6 games next year...6 wins isn't good enough, he has been here 6 years he shouldn't have shown a lot more than he has...if all we can hope for is a .500 record then get rid of the guy now and get a guy in here who will not make excuses and who will expect to win more than 50% of the time.
I like bustle he was the right guy at the right time but now I think it is time for someone else to get us to the next level and I do not think I or anyone else is wrong for thinking that way.
Rivals is pretty slick for the top 50 D1A schools recruiting comparisons and for players rated with 3 stars and above. For UL and the SBC, it is not worth the time to read (for now).
As for the comment of people not sticking around to see how well our recent recruits will impact next year... I doubt anyone on here is turning their back on UL football. We are disgruntled, and have a right to be. I know we are young and inexperienced on the field... but defense is mostly about overall athletic ability and coaching that knows how to harness that ability. By this time of the year, even with youth, we should be seeing evidence of emerging talent and definitely coaching. I see heart and some talent (mental and athleticism) in individuals, but not in total defense. I do consider the youthful OL a big issue for offense... but I haven't been that altogether critical of our offensive players (offensive coaching... I have criticism).
As for recruiting and other complaints about this staff... when you are losing, no stone shall remain unthrown. It's one of the laws of the universe and has yet to be disproven.
Yeah, I know those recruiting sites have to be taken with a grain of salt. Same thing with Scout.com. Some people think it is biased either for or against southern players, I don't remember which one. But as far as a tool for fans to use, we really don't have any other way to make a judgement about talent.
If anyone can remember the Marty Fletcher years, with Butch Pierre doing the majority of the recruiting. We had gobs of talent with Kevin Brooks, Sidney Grider, Aaron Mitchell, Todd Hill, Marcus Stokes, and on and on and on. Fletcher couldn't coach his way out of a wet paper bag, but our talent carried us to the NCAA tournament. LSU's resurgence in basketball these past couple years has one thing in common with Fletcher-coached teams. You got it, Butch Pierre. The reason I bring it up is because it is a good example of good recruiting being able to overshadow so-so coaching. Basketball is also a sport where a couple good players can make a much bigger difference than in football, so it could be a bad comparison, but oh well.
As far as next years spring game, you don't know how hard I am praying you are right.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)