Look, MSU was the better team Saturday night.
But I still don't believe they were the better team overall. We played two teams that are much better than McNeese, and came close to beating both of them... and then we lost to a 1AA by 3 touchdowns? What's wrong with THAT picture?
My brother, a McNeese alum, came in for the game and he noted how we moved the ball at will in the first half, but kept shooting ourselves in the foot. We don't do that, we put 'em away in the 1st half, and cruise home.
But we kept handing MSU hope, and momentum.
Losing to a program a division below hurts, all the more because they recruit against us. But c'mon, does anybody really believe McNeese is ahead of us, in anything-- including football?
Personally, I have a suspicion about what happened. The coaches-- WITH PRESSURE FROM ALL OF US-- changed their approach last week. From what I heard, the practice was much more intense than it had been for USC or Ohio.
And that may have been our undoing.
With all the pressure, maybe the kids choked. Which is certainly what I saw on the field. We choked. Every coach goes to great lengths to give the kids the same routine, every week, to keep them consistent. Apparently Bustle et cie. violated that maxim last week.
Everybody talks about this being Bustle's 5th year. But he didn't inherit a program in disarray, he inherited a program in deep debt. He would have been better off starting out with NO program, with a ZERO balance, because as it was, he inherited a lot of weak players who occupied his scholarships for up to 3 years. Add on top of that a short 1st-year recruiting season, and then the difficulty of recruiting to a program that was struggling-- again, because his scholarships were all tied up.
You could make a case for this only being Bustle's second year, because it has taken him that long just to get decent-- not great-- players.
Now, if the rest of the season stinks, yeah, we need to look long & hard at Bustle. But for now, let's see what he can do.