The Big 12 makes so much sense---They lost 2 states that being Neb and Missou---They would gain 2 states back with UL and ARk St---Great geographical fit and 2 programs on the rise---Are ARK ST and UL Neb and Missou NO---buy it can be again 2 more states that closely bump existing teams in Okla, Kan TEX!!! I guess Tulsa and Houston are ahead of us now but that puts another in Okla and even more in TEX!!!!
Totally agree Boomer, the Geographics are great, fans want to travel just not way the heck cross country. Arkansas St and Louisiana keep it compact, and different things to see, FOOD to eat, venues to watch the battles in! While building this $115 Million Athletic master plan, we Must continue to win, increase revenues(even though Belt Revnue is basically null and void), and increase butts in seats and travel butts too and maybe just maybe the Big 12 is not such a stretch!
We must do a few things before we get to a status that the Big 12 would be interested in...
1- Acquire S.R.E. B. 4 Yr. 1 status. We are currently 4 yr 2.
2- 35,000 per game
3- at least around a 30 million per year budget...Baylor is currently last in the Big 12 with a 48 million dollar budget but that includes the 18 mil per year that they receive from the Conference TV contract
4- RU/VH rating from Carnegie.
Consistent winning seasons for a few more years may achieve this. Meanwhile I am for trying to gain membership in the AAC with Houston, Tulane and others...and no, Tulane will not block us.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)