I agree with Kyle's sentiment that, when push comes to shove, our staff (and the staffs of many similar mid-majors) are in no way inferior to the coaching staffs of the "big boys." If I had a kid with the ability, I would LOVE for him/her to participate in collegiate athletics here at UL, but I'd certainly kick the tires on offers from "bigger" schools. There's always the argument of "play here vs. ride the pine there," and it's an argument I'm a big proponent of. It's something we should be pushing because we can give kids who are talents but aren't blue chip 5 star athletes an opportunity to prove it on the field. That said, the blue chips will go to the big boys 9 times out of 10 because you can get drafted in the middle rounds of the NFL based purely on 40 times and where you went to school. Every year teams like Ohio State and USC and LSU put guys into the league that barely touched the field, but the thought is "you can't teach talent, and they went to that program so there's got to be something there."
At the end of the day, most things are the same. What isn't the same, though, is money and facilities. We're making strides, but we've got a ways to go. In my mind, the best thing we can do is make sure we've got better facilities than everybody in the state not named LSU, and among the best in the south with the exception of the SEC schools. I have no doubt that we can have a stadium and football complex as nice or better than Southern Miss and Tulane and schools on that level. It's just really hard to compete with this, though, and I don't think it should be our goal; here's Bama's newly renovated locker room/facilities, with a reported price tag of $9 million.