I received my copy of La Louisiane magazine this morning. Check out the article "Living our Brand" on page 22.
http://communicationsandmarketing.lo...Summer2013.pdf
Why is the university brass pushing this "UL Lafayette" moniker through our promotional magazine?
My interpretation of the whole "name" saga is, based on the name "Louisiana" being awarded and then taken away from us by grape-and-yella politics 20 years ago, we should be making every effort to brand ourselves with the "clean" nickname and readily-identifiable moniker, "Louisiana." This branding effort works through social media; my friends not associated with the school use "Louisiana" because I use the term. They then spread it.
Yes, our official name is "The University of Louisiana at Lafayette," just like "The University of California at Berkeley." This doesn't stop them from the "clean" nickname of "Cal" or "California." It should be the same here.
This seems self-defeating. Students and faculty are influenced by this slick, well-laid-out magazine.
Why are they pushing this local "UL Lafayette" moniker that 1) obscures even the city since there is a Lafayette, Indiana, a Lafayette College, etc. and 2) TOTALLY obscures the state we represent?
I wish administration, sports information, faculty, students and media were all on the same page pushing the "University of Louisiana" brand. As it is, it looks like the university magazine--and administration--didn't get the memo.